User talk:Hymnodist.2004

talk:Hymnodist.2004

July 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tony Randazzo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tony Randazzo was changed by Hymnodist.2004 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852519 on 2016-07-04T06:45:00+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Tony Randazzo a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 08:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

 Note: I already asked an administrator to fix it, so no need to worry about it. But for future reference try to use the move function instead. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 08:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

 Note: I also just noticed your cut and paste move of Richard Umbers I asked the same administrator to fix that one as well. Just a note but moves like this may lead to WP:CIR Issues being raised. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 08:46, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: June Nixon (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:June Nixon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Hymnodist.2004, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of National Fart Day for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Fart Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Fart Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graham87 07:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Climate data

Hello, it's great that you're interested in the weather, but please don't add recent data to articles that hasn't been quality-controlled, like you did at Camden, New South Wales. If it's not in the pages whose titles start with "Climate statistics", it hasn't been properly checked for quality yet. Also those pages are far better for climate data tables than the newer monthly data pages. Graham87 07:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Mention on Catholicism WikiProject talk page

Hi again, I hate to bombard you with messages, but I've brought up some of your edits at this section of the Catholicism WikiProject talk page. Graham87 09:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hymnodist.2004. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:June Nixon

Hello, Hymnodist.2004. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "June Nixon".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 07:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Merle's Tune) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Merle's Tune, Hymnodist.2004!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this article - it's appreciated. It's just been reviewed. Could you please look it over and see if you can help address the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Merrelyn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Merrelyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merrelyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nördic Nightfury 08:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Knock-knock joke

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pro-marriage movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pro-marriage movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-marriage movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 13:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patsy Ford Simms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for this! It was a mistake, it was meant to be to the Swahili language; I've fixed it. Thanks for alerting me!

Please sign your talk page posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Funcrunch (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

NO worries, thanks for letting me know!! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 02:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

talk pages

The usual way to talk to someone else is on their User Talk page. If you can get to their user page, look at the tabs across the top, and one of them is called Talk. Click on that and you will see that user's talk page. Click on New Section and you can add a new message with a subject and the whatever want to say. Sign it by typing ~~~~ which will be magically converted into your signature, just like this for me 08:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

If you need any help, please feel free to ask me. It is not an easy learning curve to get started with Wikipedia, but it is a very worthwhile thing to do, contributing to the vision of all knowledge being freely available to all people. Try to remember that when the going gets tough! Kerry (talk) 08:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Kerry! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 08:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Beautifully signed! Kerry (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hymnodist.2004. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Songs are formatted with quotes. Larger works are italicized.

If we read Silent Night, it's a case of poor capitalization, even if it's linked See MOS:CAPS. If we read "Silent Night", it's a song. If we read Silent Night, it's a larger work (an oratorio, book, album or film). See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Titles of works. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hymnodist.2004. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Move of Émile Bernard reverted.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your bold move of Émile Bernard has been reverted because an editor has found it to be controversial. Per Wikipedia:Requested moves, a move request must be placed on the article's talk page, and the request be open for discussion for seven days, "if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". Such consensus is particularly required before moving a title with incoming links in order to create a disambiguation page at that title. If you believe that this move is appropriate, please initiate such a discussion to form the appropriate consensus. Again, please note that moving a page with a longstanding title and/or a large number of incoming links is more likely to be considered controversial, and may be contested. bd2412 T 21:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Eugene Hurley

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Hymnodist.2004, thanks for creating Eugene Hurley!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for several issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve John Patrick O'Loughlin

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Hymnodist.2004, thanks for creating John Patrick O'Loughlin!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for several issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Star Carol

Hi, I'm Abishe. Hymnodist.2004, thanks for creating Star Carol!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Hello Hymnodist.2004: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 14:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 14:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Days_of_the_year#Style. The article about the person you added to December 31 did not have any source to back up your addition to that page so it has been reverted. Please do not restore it without providing a direct reliable source. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! I simply copied that information from the Wikipedia page about Stephen Cleobury and forgot to copy the source as well; but I had a look at the source given on the Stephen Cleobury page which says that he was born on 31 December 1948; and I couldn't find any reference to 31 December, only to 1948 as the birth year. Can you please review that as well, in case that's an unreferenced piece of information? If you do find a reference to the date that I missed in the provided source, please let me know and I'll update the 31 December page providing the same reference. For the record, I Googled "Stephen Cleobury 31 December 1948" and found a lot of sites of the same nature as Wikipedia which claim the same birth date, but nothing more substantiah than that. Thank you! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 05:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Colin Smith (religious and hymnodist)

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Hymnodist.2004, thanks for creating Colin Smith (religious and hymnodist)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please clean up the bare URLs. For more information, please see WP:CITE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laetare Sunday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Apology for 2018

This edit was uncalled for. I only wanted to trim your descriptions, not to revert your additions. Sorry about that. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Not a problem, thanks very much for the message! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 04:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Feast of the Sacred Heart into Sacred Heart. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Friday the 13th, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Unnecessary tagging

When a statement is cited within the article body of a page, it doesn't need to be cited again in the lead. This means that tagging statements as uncited is completely unnecessary. Please desist. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Where in the article in question is the statement cited? Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 10:08, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

??? Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 13:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

For FDR's page, the ranking is cited within "Historical reputation". Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:22, 14 March 2018 (UTC0)

Thank you. Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 00:39, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

You are welcome to add content, so long as you give us sources we can verify. (See WP:V and WP:RS.) It helps if you add the source in the same edit you add content, because otherwise we don't know if you'll return to finish the job. The instructions for citing sources are at WP:CITE. I hope that helps. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:35, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Chris, yes that is very helpful! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 00:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Public holidays in Easter Island

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Hymnodist.2004, thanks for creating Public holidays in Easter Island!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

If you had checked the talk page, you would see that I have a source and there was a technical error when I tried to add it. I attempted to re-add the reference, and had the same problem. Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 11:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

The message on the talk page was left four days after I contacted you, and no one would look on the talk page for a source. I've added it in, it needs re-formatting slightly but the information is now there. If you need help again, just ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your help; much appreciated! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Hymnodist.2004. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Sean Rees-Wemyss. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alana Mansour

The article Alana Mansour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. WP:TOOSOON

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 04:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Sean Rees-Wemyss moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sean Rees-Wemyss, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. The editor whose username is Z0 14:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Note on adding unsourced content

Hey, I'm Z0. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The editor whose username is Z0 14:23, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. I’m not aware of having published unsourced material; could you please point me to the content you’re questioning and I’ll see if I made a mistake. Thank you! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 04:33, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alana Mansour

The article Alana Mansour has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AussieLegend (✉) 09:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for this! I've added some sources to the article so that the proposed deletion can be removed. (I thought I had put sources in when I created the article, but clearly not.) Thanks for the assistance! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Alana Mansour, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Famous birthdays and IMDB are not reliable references. reddogsix (talk) 13:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I added the sources and you deleted them! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh hang on, you’re saying the issue is with the sources. Sorry! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I’ve put better sources in now. Thank you! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 14:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Alana Mansour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alana Mansour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alana Mansour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

OK. Thank you! Hymnodist.2004 (talk) 03:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alana Mansour

The article Alana Mansour has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AussieLegend (✉) 07:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sean Rees-Wemyss (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sean Rees-Wemyss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sean Rees-Wemyss, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer talk 12:12, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Elizabeth Joan Cosnett) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Elizabeth Joan Cosnett, Hymnodist.2004!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for your new article on Elizabeth Joan Cosnett.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 02:14, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (John Bunyan (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating John Bunyan (disambiguation), Hymnodist.2004!

Wikipedia editor Dan Koehl just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

ok

To reply, leave a comment on Dan Koehl's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dan Koehl (talk) 08:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Revd Dr John Bunyan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revd Dr John Bunyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revd Dr John Bunyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sean Rees-Wemyss

Hello, Hymnodist.2004. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sean Rees-Wemyss".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)