User talk:John Broughton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Click here to start a new section. (The edit summary will be created automatically; it will be the same as the heading of the new section.)


18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

20:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

17:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #5[edit]

Welcome to the fifth newsletter for the new Growth team!  

The Growth team's objective is to work on software changes that help retain new contributors in mid-size Wikimedia projects.

New projects for discussion[edit]

We began the "Personalized first day" project with the welcome survey so that we could gather information about what newcomers are trying to accomplish. The next step is to use that information to create experiences that help the newcomers accomplish their goal – actually personalizing their first day. We asked for community thoughts in the previous newsletter, and after discussing with community members and amongst our team, we are now planning two projects as next steps: "engagement emails" and "newcomer homepage".

  • Engagement emails: this project was first discussed positively by community members here back in September 2018, and the team how has bandwidth to pursue it. The idea is that newcomers who leave the wiki don't get encouraged to return to the wiki and edit. We can engage them through emails that send them the specific information they need to be successful – such as contact from a mentor, the impact of their edits, or task recommendations. Please read over the project page, and comment on its discussion page with any ideas, questions, or concerns. Do you think this is a good idea? Where could we go wrong?
  • Newcomer homepage: we developed the idea for this project after analyzing the data from the welcome survey and EditorJourney datasets. We saw that many newcomers seem to be looking for a place to get started – a place that collects their past work, options for future work, and ways to learn more. We can build this place, and it can connect to the engagement emails. The content of both could be guided by what newcomers say they need during their welcome survey, and contain things like contact from a mentor, impact of their edits, or task recommendations. Please read over the project page, and comment on its discussion page with any ideas, questions, or concerns. Do you think this is a good idea? Where could we go wrong?

Initial reports on newcomer activity[edit]

We have published initial reports on each of the team's first two projects. These reports give the basic numbers from each project, and there are many more questions we will continue to answer in future reports. We're excited about these initial findings. They have already helped us define and design parts of our future projects.

  • Welcome survey: the initial report on welcome survey responses is available here. Some of the main findings:
    • Most users respond to the survey, giving it high response rates of 67% and 62% in Czech and Korean Wikipedias, respectively.
    • The survey does not cause newcomers to be less likely to edit.
    • The most common reason for creating an account in Korean Wikipedia is to read articles—not for editing—with 29% of Korean users giving that responses.
    • Large numbers of respondents said they are interested in being contacted to get help with editing: 36% in Czech and 53% in Korean.
  • Understanding first day: the initial report on what newcomers do on their first day is available here. Some of the main findings:
    • Large numbers of users view help or policy pages on their first day: 42% in Czech and 28% in Korean.
    • Large numbers of users view their own User or User Talk page on their first day: 34% in Czech and 39% in Korean.
    • A majority of new users open an editor on their first day – but about a quarter of them do not go on to save an edit during that time.

Help panel deployment[edit]

The help panel was deployed in Czech and Korean Wikipedias on January 10. Over the past four weeks:

  • About 400 newcomers in each wiki have seen the help panel button.
  • About 20% of them open up the help panel.
  • About 50% of those who open it up click on one of the links.
  • About 5% of Czech users ask questions, and about 1% of Korean users ask questions.

We think that the 20% open rate and 50% click rate are strong numbers, showing that a lot of people are looking for help, and many want to help themselves by looking at help pages. The somewhat lower numbers of asking questions (especially in Korean Wikipedia) has caused us to consider new features to allow people to help themselves. We're going to be adding a search bar to the help panel next, which will allow users to type a search that only looks for pages in the Help and Wikipedia namespaces.

How to create a good feedback page?[edit]

What is the way to built a good help page? What blocks you when writing an help page? Your replies will help to create better help contents to newcomers, that would be used on Help panel.

Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot, 14:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC) • Give feedbackSubscribe or unsubscribe.

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago[edit]

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk to us about talking[edit]

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Related to this, I mentioned your book at mw:Talk pages consultation 2019/Discussion tools in the past. Please Be Bold and correct any errors and omissions that you see, or drop by the talk page and tell stories about what Wikipedia was like back in the day.  ;-) Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 32[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019

  • #1Lib1Ref
  • New and expanded partners
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 February 2019[edit]

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team updates #6[edit]

18:19, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

19:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

18:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Judicial service[edit]

In my experience, it is the norm to refer to "judicial service"; we have literally thousands of articles with headings for judicial service, or specifically for state judicial service and federal judicial service. bd2412 T 01:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412: I'll defer to your expertise, though I'm glad to see that you didn't think there was a need to repeat "service" in the subsection headings. (My larger gripe is with sentences that read, for example, "She served in the position of Deputy Whatever from [date] ... ", when it could simply read "She was the Deputy Whatever from [date] ... "). -- John Broughton (♫♫) 02:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That, I am fine with. Thanks. bd2412 T 02:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 March 2019[edit]

16:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #7[edit]

16:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Jay Shetty[edit]

Just submitted new Jay Shetty draft for review. Thanks for getting the word out and I hope you’ll take a look. Thank you.

Added a new source to Jay Shetty’s draft - I hope you’ll take a look. Thanks!--Marysairplane (talk) 02:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted a recent edit to this page due to no source. Did I do this correctly? --Marysairplane (talk) 00:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marysairplane - yes. That wasn't a particularly bad edit, but it wasn't helpful, so removing it was a good idea.
If this had been a registered editor, rather than an IP address (anonymous user) doing the edit, I would have checked to see if you had posted a comment to the user talk page, letting the user know why you did the revert. But it's generally not worthwhile to do this for an IP editor, since the chances of the user subsequently seeing your comment (let alone considering it seriously) is very low. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 03:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the pointers. Just checking - another anonymous user left an edit with a tag that reads “notable?” at the top of the page and I’m not sure how to proceed. Looking for advice. --Marysairplane (talk) 01:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marysairplane - I've reverted the edits that are related to the template/tag. It was an anonymous IP editor that put up the template, and there was no explanation on the article talk page about why he/she thought that the topic wasn't notable. Given the source of the edit (IP editor with no history of other edits), the lack of detail in both the edit summary and on the talk page, and the number of sources actually cited in the article, the posting of the template isn't credible. So I deleted it, with an invitation, in the edit summary, to discuss further the matter on the article talk page. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 02:41, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John - this page has been vandalized multiple times by anonymous users over the last 24 hours. Do you think this qualifies to be protected? —Marysairplane (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marysairplane -- I don't think that the amount or type of vandalism has quite risen to the level where semi-protection (preventing anonymous editors from editing) is justified, though this is subjective. The policy is at WP:PREEMPTIVE, if you haven't looked yet.
The most persistent of the editors has been blocked (for 31 hours), and I added a post to their user talk page to try to explain Wikipedia policies; they're trying to add content, not vandalize per se, though unsourced negative content is still unacceptable.
But if you want to ask for semi-protection, I certainly wouldn't object. Or you could wait a day or two and see if problem persists. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:58, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. The problem persisted for several days, so I went ahead and requested semi protection. —Marysairplane (talk) 23:17, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This page is receiving vandalism again and I’m looking for some help. I reverted some edits yesterday due to a lack of independent and reliable sources and the user has replaced them. One of them is a self-published source. I’d like to get a second pair of eyes on this if you can take a look. Maybe we should consider requesting protection again. —Marysairplane (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marysairplane -- I've made some changes to the article, and posted at Talk:Jay Shetty. This conversation should be continued on that page, if you don't think the information now in the Wikipedia article is acceptable. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 02:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

00:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Call for submissions for the Community Growth space at Wikimania 2019[edit]

Welcome to a special newsletter from the Growth team! This special newsletter is not about Wikimedia Foundation Growth team projects. Instead, it is a call for submissions for the Community Growth space at Wikimania 2019. We think that many people who receive this newsletter may have something valuable to contribute to this space at Wikimania. We haven't translated the newsletter, because Wikimania's language is English.

Please see below for the message from the organizers of the Community Growth space at Wikimania.

---

Wikimania 2019 is organized into 19 “spaces”, which are all accepting proposals for sessions. This message comes from the team organizing the Community Growth space.

Since you are interested b Growth team projects, and potentially involved in welcoming newcomers initiatives on your wiki, we would like to invite you to submit a proposal to the Community Growth space because of the actions you’ve done around newcomers on wikis. The deadline for submission is June 1. See below for Community Growth submission topics and session formats. Topics and sessions have to be in English.

In the Community Growth space, we will come together for discussions, presentations, and workshops that address these questions:

  • What is and is not working around attracting and retaining newcomers?
  • How should Wikimedia activities evolve to help communities grow and flourish?
  • How should our technology and culture evolve to help new populations to come online, participate and become community members?

Recommended topics: please see this link for the list for the list of recommended topics. If you do not plan to submit a proposal, you can also suggest additional topics here. If your topic does not fit into our space, remember that there are 18 other spaces that could welcome you sharing your knowledge and perspective.

Types of session. We prefer sessions that are participatory, interactive, promote conversations, and give a voice to parts of our movement that are heard less often. Please see this link for the list of recommended session formats.

Poster submissions. Posters are also a good way to introduce a topic, or show some results of an action. Please consider submitting one!

More information about the Community Growth space, topics, and submission formats is available on the proposal page.

Please submit your proposal. The reviews will happen at the beginning of June.

If you have questions about Wikimania in general, please ask them on the Wikimania wiki.

On behalf of the Community Growth leadership team, Trizek (WMF), 11:44, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - May 2019[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the May 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.18[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 33[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019

  • #1Lib1Ref
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - Update[edit]

Dear reader,

Thank you for subscribing to TheWikiWizard. This is a special message letting you know that the June/July/August issues of TheWikiWizard may be delayed, due to the absence of User:Thegooduser. Thegooduser and the other editors of TWW will try their best to deliver these issues to you. Thank you for reading TWW, and we hope to see you again in September 2019. Thank you for your patience and understanding, and enjoy your summer! :-) We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Happy Editing!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 00:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 May 2019[edit]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 6[edit]

15:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #8[edit]

09:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

20:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

17:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 7[edit]

Request from MasterClass[edit]

Hi John Broughton. I work for MasterClass, an online portal for learning new skills (cooking, script-writing, etc.). The current “Reception” section on the page about us is not balanced at all – just 100% negative – whereas most reviews about us are more balanced. I took a shot at a more balanced version here and shared it on the Talk page, but haven’t gotten anyone to take a look.

I know it’s awkward for the company to write their own reviews section, but not sure what else can be done. The current is so overtly unfair. I was wondering if you could review and post your thoughts on the article Talk page. BethMasterClass (talk) 18:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

20:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019

  • Partnerships
  • #1Lib1Ref
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Classy, fair edit / addition[edit]

To the Patrick Pizzella page -- perfect, factual, even-handed re Abramoff. There were crooked doings and crooked guys around Casino Jack, but Pizzella had done 14 years of public service prior to ever working at Preston Gates, and since then three Presidents of both parties have appointed Pizzella, apparently without incident or regret. --GaryWMaloney (talk) 16:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gary - I'm not convinced that Pizzella is bipartisan, at all, but thank you for the compliment on the editing.
I'm not convinced because I'm sure that Obama nominated Pizzella as the minority (Republican, at the time) member of the FLRA. (Here's the requirement for split membership of the FLRA.) That means, of course, that Pizzella was tolerable to Obama, but typically such nominations involve political negotiations, or at least considerations and signaling, not really positive feelings.
None of that is in the Wikipedia article because I haven't found any sources for it, and given that membership in the FLRA isn't (apparently) considered particularly newsworthy, I don't think I will - particularly because I'm not willing to spend a lot of time looking. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 17:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing News #1—July 2019[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

Did you know that you can use the visual editor on a mobile device?

Every article has a pencil icon at the top. Tap on the pencil icon to start editing.

Edit Cards

Toolbar with menu opened

This is what the new Edit Cards for editing links in the mobile visual editor look like. You can try the prototype here: 📲 Try Edit Cards.

Welcome back to the Editing newsletter.

Since the last newsletter, the team has released two new features for the mobile visual editor and has started developing three more. All of this work is part of the team's goal to make editing on mobile web simpler.

Before talking about the team's recent releases, we have a question for you:

Are you willing to try a new way to add and change links?

If you are interested, we would value your input! You can try this new link tool in the mobile visual editor on a separate wiki.

Follow these instructions and share your experience:

📲 Try Edit Cards.

Recent releases[edit]

The mobile visual editor is a simpler editing tool, for smartphones and tablets using the mobile site. The Editing team has recently launched two new features to improve the mobile visual editor:

  1. Section editing
    • The purpose is to help contributors focus on their edits.
    • The team studied this with an A/B test. This test showed that contributors who could use section editing were 1% more likely to publish the edits they started than people with only full-page editing.
  2. Loading overlay
    • The purpose is to smooth the transition between reading and editing.

Section editing and the new loading overlay are now available to everyone using the mobile visual editor.

New and active projects[edit]

This is a list of our most active projects. Watch these pages to learn about project updates and to share your input on new designs, prototypes and research findings.

  • Edit cards: This is a clearer way to add and edit links, citations, images, templates, etc. in articles. You can try this feature now. Go here to see how: 📲Try Edit Cards.
  • Mobile toolbar refresh: This project will learn if contributors are more successful when the editing tools are easier to recognize.
  • Mobile visual editor availability: This A/B test asks: Are newer contributors more successful if they use the mobile visual editor? We are collaborating with 20 Wikipedias to answer this question.
  • Usability improvements: This project will make the mobile visual editor easier to use.  The goal is to let contributors stay focused on editing and to feel more confident in the editing tools.

Looking ahead[edit]

  • Wikimania: Several members of the Editing Team will be attending Wikimania in August 2019. They will lead a session about mobile editing in the Community Growth space. Talk to them about how editing can be improved.
  • Talk Pages: In the coming months, the Editing Team will begin improving talk pages and communication on the wikis.

Learning more[edit]

The VisualEditor on mobile is a good place to learn more about the projects we are working on. The team wants to talk with you about anything related to editing. If you have something to say or ask, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) and Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #9[edit]

14:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 8[edit]

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

15:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019[edit]

Re: "Wiki values"[edit]

Thanks. The way I used the phrase "wiki values" is a bit jargon-like. Still, I thought the mention of "values" made the phrase harder to misinterpret, because values are usually not associated with wiki as a technological platform. Nevertheless, it's indeed "Wikipedia's values" I'm appealing to, so I'll change the wording per your suggestion to make it clear. GregorB (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GregorB: Thanks! I had considered making the changes myself, because I was sure that was what you meant. But since the page was personal opinion, not a Signpost news article, I didn't feel like I had the right to directly edit it. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - September 2019[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the September 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We Hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 21:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019

  • Wikimania
  • We're building something great, but..
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • A Wikibrarian's story
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #10[edit]

18:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 9[edit]

15:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

23:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Editing News #2 – Mobile editing and talk pages – October 2019[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Inside this newsletter, the Editing team talks about their work on the mobile visual editor, on the new talk pages project, and at Wikimania 2019.

Help[edit]

What talk page interactions do you remember? Is it a story about how someone helped you to learn something new? Is it a story about how someone helped you get involved in a group? Something else? Whatever your story is, we want to hear it!

Please tell us a story about how you used a talk page. Please share a link to a memorable discussion, or describe it on the talk page for this project. The team would value your examples. These examples will help everyone develop a shared understanding of what this project should support and encourage.

Talk Pages[edit]

The Talk Pages Consultation was a global consultation to define better tools for wiki communication. From February through June 2019, more than 500 volunteers on 20 wikis, across 15 languages and multiple projects, came together with members of the Foundation to create a product direction for a set of discussion tools. The Phase 2 Report of the Talk Page Consultation was published in August. It summarizes the product direction the team has started to work on, which you can read more about here: Talk Page Project project page.

The team needs and wants your help at this early stage. They are starting to develop the first idea. Please add your name to the "Getting involved" section of the project page, if you would like to hear about opportunities to participate.

Mobile visual editor[edit]

The Editing team is trying to make it simpler to edit on mobile devices. The team is changing the visual editor on mobile. If you have something to say about editing on a mobile device, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.

Edit Cards[edit]

What happens when you click on a link. The new Edit Card is bigger and has more options for editing links.

Toolbar[edit]

The editing toolbar is changing in the mobile visual editor. The old system had two different toolbars. Now, all the buttons are together. Tell the team what you think about the new toolbar.
  • In September, the Editing team updated the mobile visual editor's editing toolbar. Anyone could see these changes in the mobile visual editor.
    • One toolbar: All of the editing tools are located in one toolbar. Previously, the toolbar changed when you clicked on different things.
    • New navigation: The buttons for moving forward and backward in the edit flow have changed.
    • Seamless switching: an improved workflow for switching between the visual and wikitext modes.
  • Feedback: You can try the refreshed toolbar by opening the mobile VisualEditor on a smartphone. Please post your feedback on the Toolbar feedback talk page.

Wikimania[edit]

The Editing Team attended Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. They led a session on the mobile visual editor and a session on the new talk pages project. They tested two new features in the mobile visual editor with contributors. You can read more about what the team did and learned in the team's report on Wikimania 2019.

Looking ahead[edit]

  • Talk Pages Project: The team is thinking about the first set of proposed changes. The team will be working with a few communities to pilot those changes. The best way to stay informed is by adding your username to the list on the project page: Getting involved.
  • Testing the mobile visual editor as the default: The Editing team plans to post results before the end of the calendar year. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: VisualEditor as mobile default project page.
  • Measuring the impact of Edit Cards: The Editing team hopes to share results in November. This study asks whether the project helped editors add links and citations. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: Edit Cards project page.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - October 2019[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the September 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:43, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 02:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

16:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 817 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.


To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding rating on Shahrbanu[edit]

Hi. I just wanted to thank you for rating an article I had written, Shahrbanu, about 20 minutes ago. Unfortunately, at the time you had given your rating, the article had been experiencing some disruptive edits in the "Historicity" section. I was wondering whether any problematic content you noticed in that section had effected your rating? Thank you.
Alivardi (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alivardi - No, the rating (assessment) was based on the number and type of sources cited, and the amount of text in the article, not on a a close reading of the content.
One could argue, I suppose, that the article deserves a higher rating (specifically, "B" class), but that requires (in my mind) a much closer examination of content. Since the article was had no assessment at all, I thought that I'd start the process with"C" class. But if someone else (you?) wants to give the article a "B" class rating, I doubt very much that I'd be concerned enough to do the work necessary to knowledgeably agree or disagree. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 04:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, I wouldn't expect you to provide another assessment without good cause. But thank you for explaining the process to me, I really appreciate it.
Alivardi (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 10[edit]

22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #11[edit]

15:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

20:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 36[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11[edit]

Special Notice for TheWikiWizard[edit]

Dear Reader, You may have noticed that you did not receive a mailing for the November 2019 Issue, this is due to thegooduser being very busy with schoolwork and other important life issues. We do apologize that you have not received the November issue, and we will continue to work very hard to deliver to you the December Special Issue for 2019. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. If you like hearing about Wikipedia News and events, don't forget that The Signpost (our rival paper) does cover such events, in case we do not publish an issue on time. Thank you for subscribing and we will work very hard to deliever the December Issue. Best, --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 04:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

16:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

16:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Best practices for help pages[edit]

Do you happen to know of any good research on how to write end-user documentation? This is in the context of mw:Growth/Communities/How to create help contents. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Whatamidoing (WMF): No, I don't. I do have a 2007 author's guide for the Missing Manual series; books in that series are essentially 100% end-user documentation. I'd be happy to share that (or, more accurately, selected pages; some of the material is relevant only to how books in that series are laid out, and to specific technology used for that series). -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that's a good idea. Do you want to leave a note on the mw page directly? Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

00:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Conflict of interests review[edit]

Hi John. I got your name from WikiProject Cooperation. I work for Sitel. Currently the page about us (a multi-billion dollar company) is about 1.5 paragraphs long and has no Wikipedia-compliant citations. I proposed a much more complete draft replacement that got very positive feedback. However, my understanding is that another editor should ideally be the one to implement the draft? I was wondering if you could take a look and see if you approve or have any other feedback. DanSlavov (talk) 19:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DanSlavov: Yes, WP:COI should make it clear that it's considered very bad form for an employee of a company to edit an article about that company. Thank you for following Wikipedia rules by asking other editors to help with changes.
I've gone ahead and put your version into "mainspace", as a live article. However, I do have doubts about one thing (without looking at your sources, admittedly) - I find it hard to believe a company with 18 employees, in 1985, could have $100 million in revenues. And I also find it hard to believe that whoever owned that company would sell it for $165,000. If the revenues were, say, $1 million, that would make sense. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sitel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Lynch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays[edit]

New Page Review newsletter December 2019[edit]

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Can you help me find info about Provelt?[edit]

Hi John. You helped me a couple of years ago with a problem. I hope you can point me in the right direction with a new problem. Something called Provelt edited a page I am working on (Marshall B. Clinard) on. Here is the diff. There are things in Provelt's edit which I want to retain, but I don't want the references collapsed (I don't want hard carriage returns removed from the references). I am happy to figure out what I need to do to retain the things Provelt did which I want to retain. Now my questions! Is there a way to block Provelt from working on this article, and a few other articles, where I and the other editors want the references left as they are? More generally, can you point me to a talk page for Provelt where I can ask this myself (or point me to Provelt documention which might tell me how to block Provelt, or block specific actions by Provelt)? CWBoast (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CWBoast: Thanks for the diff; that made things much easier for me to analyze.
ProveIt is a gadget (a tool); you'll find documentation here: Wikipedia:ProveIt. To answer one of your questions, no, you can't prevent other editors from using it, and you can't (if you're not the one using it) modify its actions. But if you really think it's doing things wrong, you could raise that issue on the related Talk page.
What you probably want to do (first) is have a discussion with the editor (User:~riley), who, I note, is fairly experienced. You might approach him/her with a question, on his/her talk page ("I don't understand why you're doing X," or "You're not doing Y the same way that I am; am I wrong?") rather than with a conclusion ("You're doing X and you shouldn't be") or a demand ("Please stop editing this page"). Also, see WP:OWN). -- John Broughton (♫♫) 17:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CWBoast, sorry for any inconvenience. I understand the frustration that will present itself when an article you have written gets changed by a random person. While I can undo the my edit and the tool's removal of the hard carriages for the references, they will likely be removed again by another tool whether that be AWB or a bot. Inline references can significantly bloat the wikitext in the edit window and can become difficult and confusing. Add hard carriages to that and it is even harder to edit the document. I hope this makes sense for why those changes were made. ~riley (talk) 17:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~riley, thanks for your reply, especially your words "Inline references can significantly bloat the wikitext ...". I had noticed that some articles put only <ref name="a-name"/> in the main body and put all the actual reference information in the section titled == References == but I had never thought about how great that approach is. My goal with all the hard carriage returns was to make it easier to find the end of a reference in the wikitext, and <ref name="a-name"/> does that much better than the hard carriage returns! I'm going to redo the Marshall B. Clinard article with that referencing strategy. And, for other articles on which I have worked extensively I may do likewise, after proposing to do so on the article Talk page. Thanks again for your reply, and for all 7 of your edits to Marshall B. Clinard. CWBoast (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - January 2020[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the January 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 04:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 04:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

18:52, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 37[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Growth team updates #12[edit]

17:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12[edit]

19:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

21:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Blank Wikipedia: The Missing Manual pages. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 13[edit]

00:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

17:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed rewrite[edit]

Dear John. I am the Communications Manager at Covanta. The current page on our company only covers the controversies and only from one side of the debate. I shared a proposed rewrite that is more balanced with encyclopedic, historical information and covers controversies from multiple perspectives. Guy Macon was going to review the proposed draft, but I didn’t want to bother him given he is [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Guy_Macon#message_from_guy's_wife recovering from a heart attack]. I was wondering if you would be willing to review the proposed draft and provide any feedback. NKR2009 (talk) 15:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NKR2009: I'm not going to be able to get to this immediately, but I've put it on my "to do" list for next week. If you've not seen any evidence of my looking at the draft, please feel free to ping me again in a week or so. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 03:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No rush, but giving you a ping as requested. NKR2009 (talk) 20:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@NKR2009: I was glad to hear that you found someone else to review your rewrite. (Thanks for following Wikipedia guidelines regarding conflicts of interest.) I did have time to do a quick copyedit, a few minutes ago, of the article. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 04:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard/Workshop/Issues/Feburary/March 2020[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the Feb/March 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 03:36, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 20:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

21:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

17:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2020[edit]

17:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14[edit]

19:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Editor’s Index[edit]

I see you created the about page for the index, among other things. I was recently review a single section of the index and cleaning out the dead links related to WikiProjects. I had encountered the dead and dying while reviving a project myself. Anyway, Thanks for the work you did. I am going to take a run at cleanup over parts of the index where I believe I understand the subjects linked. —¿philoserf? (talk) 19:56, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Philoserf: - The index certainly could use a lot of cleaning up, so thank you for whatever you do. I will note that if a WikiProject is defunct (most are), but still has a page, I think it's worth linking to it, because (a) there could be useful information from the past, and (b) it could encourage an editor to try to revive the project. That's why, for example, the index has entries for a lot of failed proposals - because there is still something that can be learned.
What I think most needs to be done, when cleaning up the index, is to (1) remove redlinks (these are not obvious if the link is to a page outside of en.wikipedia.org), (2) fix links that have become redirects (the link should be changed to go directly to a page; if that page is already listed, deleting what would otherwise be a duplicate entry), and (3) change index entries where the name of the page has changed. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
John Broughton, So far i cleaned up links to dead bots, mainly. —¿philoserf? (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Philoserf: - Interesting. That's a grey area for me. If there are a bunch of bots that do/did roughly the same thing, then yes, removing links to dead ones is a good idea. By contrast, if there was only one, really useful bot for something, which no longer runs, my preference would be to put something like "(dead)" or "(not functioning)" or similar at the end of the entry. The thought is that someone might go to the index to see if there is already a bot that does something, and discover there was, or someone might say to themselves "that sounds like a useful bot; maybe I can help create something similar". -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There were none dead that hadn’t been dead since 2007/8. I will be updating the WikiProject bot space where ever I find it. It was hard to navigate with all the unmarked dead stuff when I started. I agree about marking the dead but useful and not yet replaced. I left links to bots I didn’t comprehend alone too. —¿philoserf? (talk) 20:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Philoserf: - Thanks again for taking the time to work on the index. If you look at its history, you'll find that perhaps 90% of the entries are from 2007/2008, so it's not surprising that dead bots go back that far. In any case, it's very valuable to mark entries for dead bots to show that they are dead; for those looking for an active solution, this saves them at least a click. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #1 – Discussion tools[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list

Screenshot showing what the Reply tool looks like
This early version of the Reply tool automatically signs and indents comments.

The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. The goal of the talk pages project is to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. This project is the result of the Talk pages consultation 2019.

Reply tool improved with edit tool buttons
In a future update, the team plans to test a tool for easily linking to another user's name, a rich-text editing option, and other tools.

The team is building a new tool for replying to comments now. This early version can sign and indent comments automatically. Please test the new Reply tool.

  • On 31 March 2020, the new reply tool was offered as a Beta Feature editors at four Wikipedias: Arabic, Dutch, French, and Hungarian. If your community also wants early access to the new tool, contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF).
  • The team is planning some upcoming changes. Please review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page. The team will test features such as:
    • an easy way to mention another editor ("pinging"),
    • a rich-text visual editing option, and
    • other features identified through user testing or recommended by editors.

To hear more about Editing Team updates, please add your name to the "Get involved" section of the project page. You can also watch these pages: the main project page, Updates, Replying, and User testing.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 15:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up - proposed rewrite[edit]

Just checking in on whether you still had time to review the proposed rewrite of the Covanta Energy page. NKR2009 (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know Guy Macon reviewed and implemented the draft. NKR2009 (talk) 17:11, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - April 2020[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the April 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:05, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:45, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Issue 38, January – April 2020[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020

  • New partnership
  • Global roundup

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Carole Baskin[edit]

Hello. I noticed this edit. One thing to keep in mind is that Ms Baskin married Howard Baskin in November 2004, so before November 2004, her name was not Baskin. You changed the article to say "Baskin moved in with Michael Murdock" around 1978, but she would not become "Baskin" until about 25 years after that happened, so I don't think it is appropriate to refer to her as "Baskin" when describing events before 2004. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15[edit]

16:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

20:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #13[edit]

14:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

17:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - May 2020[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the May 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2020[edit]

22:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

21:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020

  • Library Card Platform
  • New partnerships
    • ProQuest
    • Springer Nature
    • BioOne
    • CEEOL
    • IWA Publishing
    • ICE Publishing
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list

Mockup of the new reply feature, showing new editing tools
The new features include a toolbar. What do you think should be in the toolbar?

This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard/Issues/Summer 2020[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the May 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources
  • A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
  • Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
  • Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

16:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16[edit]

Editing news 2020 #3[edit]

On 16 March 2020, the 50 millionth edit was made using the visual editor on desktop.

Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:

  • The 50 millionth edit using the visual editor on desktop was made this year. More than 10 million edits have been made here at the English Wikipedia.
  • More than 2 million new articles have been created in the visual editor. More than 600,000 of these new articles were created during 2019.
  • Almost 5 million edits on the mobile site have been made with the visual editor. Most of these edits have been made since the Editing team started improving the mobile visual editor in 2018.
  • The proportion of all edits made using the visual editor has been increasing every year.
  • Editors have made more than 7 million edits in the 2017 wikitext editor, including starting 600,000 new articles in it. The 2017 wikitext editor is VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode. You can enable it in your preferences.
  • On 17 November 2019, the first edit from outer space was made in the mobile visual editor.
  • In 2019, 35% of the edits by newcomers, and half of their first edits, were made using the visual editor. This percentage has been increasing every year since the tool became available.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

16:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

19:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

13:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

15:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

16:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

20:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

17:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Editing news 2020 #4[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool[edit]

The number of comments posted with the Reply Tool from March through June 2020. People used the Reply Tool to post over 7,400 comments with the tool.

The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.

  • More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
  • Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
  • Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[274]

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

New requirements for user signatures[edit]

  • The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
  • Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next: New discussion tool[edit]

Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 17[edit]

20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter 14[edit]

09:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 40[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020

  • New partnerships
    • Al Manhal
    • Ancestry
    • RILM
  • #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
  • AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


TheWikiWizard/Issues/September 2020

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the September 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

15:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

16:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Request for help updating my page[edit]

Hi John. My name is Prerna Gupta. I would like to add an infobox and more information to the page about me. I shared a draft at Draft:Prerna Gupta. After trying BLPN, a Wikiproject, and the page’s original author, I haven’t been able to find anyone available to look at the draft. You came recommended as someone who might be willing to put some impartial eye-balls on the proposed draft. If you are available to take a look, I would greatly appreciate your time! Best regards. Prernagupta1 (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Prernagupta1: - the draft is problematical because several of the sources are things that you wrote yourself. That absolutely fails the requirements for reliable secondary sources. Specifically, source 8 (and 16, which is the same) is unusable, so any text that is supported by this source needs to be either removed, or an acceptable source found to support it. Similarly, sources 17 through 23 are essentially self-published information, or otherwise fail WP:RS, and so the related text should be removed from the (draft) article.
I realize that many of these sources are, in fact, in the published Wikipedia article. That doesn't make them acceptable, it just means that no Wikipedia editor has been interested enough to spend the time to edit the article to remove them. (One editor did, however, note the problem on the article's Talk page.)
If you're willing to remove the unacceptable sources, and related text, from the draft article (or find acceptable sources that do support the text - I suspect there are none), then yes, I'd be willing to look at using the draft article to update/expand the Prerna Gupta article. Otherwise, I'm afraid you're going to have to look for someone else to help.
I realize that Wikipedia's insistence on secondary sources for information probably seems odd. It's partly, of course, there is doubt that self-published information, even in as prestigious a place as the New York Times, is true. But it's more that Wikipedia's philosophy is that self-published information hasn't proved itself to be important - to be, if you will, worth including in an encyclopedia. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks John. I really appreciate your response and offer to help! I removed the offending self-authored citations and associated content from the draft. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do to comply with Wikipedia's standards, and thanks again for your time helping out a newbie. Best regards. Prernagupta1 (talk) 15:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Prernagupta1: Okay, done. If I've made a mistake, or you see the opportunity to improve, or you want to update the article, the best way to do that is to post to Talk:Prerna Gupta, saying exactly what you want changed (add, delete, whatever), and, if not obvious, why you want the change. And if you mention me - {{replyto|John Broughton}} - in what you post, then you don't need to post anything on my user talk page - I'll be alerted by the Talk page posting, and - more importantly - so will other editors interested in that page. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much John! I really appreciate it. I'm going to work on getting a properly licensed headshot image for the page. I had another request for you in the meantime, if you're up for it. I know it's a lot to ask after you just reviewed the Prerna Gupta page, but I also shared a draft at Talk:Hooked (app) (an app my company created) about a month ago if you have any interest in looking at that one too. I'm happy to bother someone else if you're all tapped out. Prernagupta1 (talk) 20:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Prernagupta1: I've added a template to your Talk:Hooked (app) posting, which - in theory - should attract other editors to take a look at your draft. However, there is a backlog on doing this (too few interested editors, given the demand). If no one has commented on or helped with your draft in two weeks or so from now, please feel free to drop me a note and I'll see what I can do. Or, if someone does comment or act, and - after discussion(s) with that editor - you're not happy with the result, please feel free to let me know. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. I added a headshot of myself here if you don't mind adding it to Prerna Gupta. I just emailed the Declaration of Consent to OTRS.

Regarding the Hooked app page, an editor from Request Edit showed up, but it seemed like they were expecting an individual correction, rather than a re-write/expansion. He said the draft looks good, but would prefer a shorter Features section, so I shortened it here. Prernagupta1 (talk) 17:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Prernagupta1: I've added the image to the article. However, I rarely work with images or infoboxes, so it wouldn't surprise me if another editor decides to get involved here - clipping the photo and/or reducing the display size. And if no one else does, I may take some time to learn more about what's the norm, and make adjustments myself. But at least I've started the process. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 18:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing that so quickly, John! Sounds good regarding photo resizing etc. As for the Hooked app page, how would you suggest I proceed, given the response I received from the editor who saw my edit request? Prernagupta1 (talk) 20:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Prernagupta1: The norm (or, at least, the preferred approach, from an editor's viewpoint), anyway, is that you say [as separate, bulleted items], "change A to B, delete C, change D to E, delete F", and so on. It's more work (or, at least, more thinking) to look at two different versions and decide what to keep, what to discard, and what to merge/combine, on a sentence-by-sentence basis.
It's pretty clear that the editor who responded is looking for that sentence-by-sentence approach. Your choices are (a) to wait to see if someone else jumps in who is willing to use what you have already provided [unlikely, but possible], or (b) for you to do the extra work to break out, sentence by sentence, what you want changed. (You don't have to say anything when there is a sentence to be left as is.)
If you go with (a), there is a good chance that I'll get involved in a week or two, and that will get closure, but (b) would be faster and more guaranteed to happen. You could also split the difference - pick part of the existing article that you most want changed, and spell out in detail, on the article's talk page, what you want changed. (Editors really like additions that come with a good citation; another approach would be to suggest changes that result in missing sources being added to the article.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks John. I don’t think it’s sensible to go through the proposed draft sentence by sentence and there’s no urgency. Thus, I’ll patiently wait for your review, when you get around to it. Prernagupta1 (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I just realized there’s an error on the Prerna Gupta page! I was born in 1981 (December 12, 1981), not 1980. Would it be possible to specify the correct date, or else remove it entirely? Prernagupta1 (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-October 2020[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the October 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team updates #15[edit]

10:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

16:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 41[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020

  • New partnership: Taxmann
  • WikiCite
  • 1Lib1Ref 2021

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard-November 2020[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the November 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alabama's 2nd congressional district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Moore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2020[edit]

17:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 18[edit]

Growth team updates #16[edit]

14:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 19[edit]

20:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-December 2020[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the December 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard. Pilot Project, trying a smaller and different style newsletter

  • Here are the events of December 2020

Wikipedia News[edit]

  • On the French Wikipedia, the new vector skin design has already been rolled out! Check it out here!
  • Wikipedia will soon celebrate it's 20th Birthday very soon! Go back to 2001 by visiting nostalgia.wikipedia.org !
  • EN Wikipedia has more than 6,200,000 Articles!

Humor[edit]

  • Santa is watching you.... Don't vandalise Wikipedia, or he will reward you a block and no presents this year if you do so. (Seriously don't vandalise Wikipedia, even if santa isn't watching)
  • More turkey on Christmas

Notes[edit]

  • We are trying out this pilot style newspaper, making it easier for you, and our editors to use. Please let me know what you think about this new 'style' of newspaper!
  • The Wikipedia Ads section will be omitted, to make the flow of this newsletter easier. Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and stay safe! Happy Holidays --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006 Ohio's 2nd congressional district election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Ohio's 2nd congressional district election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Perdue article[edit]

Take out "without evidence" on your David Purdue page. This is wikipedia not your personal leftist blog. If you need me to explain the difference between fact and opinion let me know. There is nothing more dangerous to the American People than liars like you pretending to be "news" or "scholars". You're nothing but a leftist hack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.49.107.112 (talk) 04:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@50.49.107.112: Well, one fact is that you've misspelled the last name of David Perdue. Another is that the wording "without evidence" wasn't added by me to the David Perdue article. A third fact is that it's not "my" article; in fact, I'm almost certainly not even one of the main editors of that article. So yes, I'm pretty sure I don't need you to help with facts. And finally, I can think of lots of things that are more dangerous to the American people than what's in a (footnoted) Wikipedia article. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 04:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Andrew Giuliani for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Giuliani, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Giuliani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #1[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Reply tool[edit]

Graph of Reply tool and full-page wikitext edit completion rates
Completion rates for comments made with the Reply tool and full-page wikitext editing. Details and limitations are in this report.

The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.

  • The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
  • It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.

Research notes:

  • As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
  • There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[344]
  • The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[345] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
  • A large A/B test will start soon.[346] This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.

New discussion tool[edit]

Screenshot of version 1.0 of the New Discussion Tool prototype.

The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[347] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.

Next: Notifications[edit]

During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard-January 2021[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the January 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard. Pilot Project, trying a smaller and different style newsletter

  • Here are the events of January!!

Wikipedia News[edit]

  • Wikipedia is now 20 years old!! Notice a different logo?
  • There is now more than 1 billion edits on Wikipedia!
  • The Simple English Wikipedia now has more than 180,000 Articles! So close to 200,000!

Humor[edit]

  • Did you realize that the word "Humour" has been spelt wrong? I didn't until now! ;)
  • I hope you didn't edit Wikipedia straight on and Missed Christmas...

Notes[edit]

  • We are trying out this pilot style newspaper, making it easier for you, and our editors to use. Please let me know what you think about this new 'style' of newspaper!
  • The Wikipedia Ads section will be omitted, to make the flow of this newsletter easier. Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and stay safe! Happy New Year! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:18, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 42[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020

  • New EBSCO collections now available
  • 1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
  • Library Card input requested
  • Libraries love Wikimedia, too!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Prerna Gupta for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prerna Gupta, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prerna Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006 West Virginia's 2nd congressional district election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 West Virginia's 2nd congressional district election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 20[edit]

17:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-February 2021[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the February 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard. Pilot Project, trying a smaller and different style newsletter

Wikipedia News[edit]

Humour[edit]

THESE STATEMENTS ARE NOT TRUE/NOT GOOD ADVICE. ALWAYS FOLLOW THE POLICIES THAT WIKIPEDIA HAS. EVERYTHING LISTED HERE IN THIS SECTION IS SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF HUMOUR

  • If you have a COI, and you don't want to declare it, don't! (For all we know, a dog could be writing [or rather typing] this statement ;) )

Notes[edit]

  • We have a new editor on our team! Berrely will be joining the TWW team as a proofreader starting from the next issue onwards! (No more typos now...)
  • The Wikipedia Ads section will be omitted, to make the flow of this newsletter easier. Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and stay safe! Happy Chinese New Year! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


19:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #17[edit]

16:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006 Michigan's 8th congressional district election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Michigan's 8th congressional district election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

23:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-March 2021[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the March 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Wikipedia News[edit]

Humour[edit]

This section was written by User:Canadian Otaku, I hope you enjoy it as much as I (Tsugaru) did!

  • If you edit Wikipedia around 1-5 AM, beware, as any admin could block you for being up too late!
  • It's really easy to break Wikipedia, just click here.
  • Ignore people telling you to stop putting "Hrrnngg,,,beans" on the article Bean (film), they don't know what good edits are.
  • Jimbo is god, and can do anything he wants to!

Notes[edit]

  • There are 2 new editors now, one of them Berrely, and CanadianOtaku. As mentioned Berrely is our new proofreader (typos beware) and Canadian Otaku is now going to be writing our Humor sections, I hope you enjoyed it. Thanks for joining us, and remember, if you want to join, just let me know!


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and stay safe! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006 California's 4th congressional district election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 California's 4th congressional district election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 42[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

  • New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
  • 1Lib1Ref
  • Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

17:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

19:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-April 2021[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the April 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Wikipedia News[edit]

  • MediaWiki has a new logo. Looks great, doesn't it?
  • Did you get to see the April Fools DYK for the Main Page? If not, catch them here (Under April 1)
  • In the Beta Features, try out "Discussion tools" it is a very useful feature for replying to talkpage messages. You will need an account to do so!

Memorials[edit]

  • Pi zero has passed away. Our condolences go out for Pi zero and anyone who knew him. Thank you Pi zero for your service here at Wikimedia. We are very sorry to hear this. We will never forget your valuable contributions to Wikipedia and it's sister projects.

Humour[edit]

Tsugaru's Humour Section

  • April Showers can't Bring May Flowers, if the Flowers ran away to June!
  • You can't get in trouble, if you don't cause trouble!
  • The May Flowers can't be flowers if they are roses!

Please find CanadianOtaku's Humour Section below

  • Sadly, there was no edit war of 2021, maybe next year.
  • This joke space is up for rent!
  • You too can be a hacker by removing everything in an article!
  • Error 410: I dropped this joke and I can't find it.

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Just a reminder that TWW is delivered between the 16th to the 20th of each month


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and stay safe! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 23:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Issue was delivered to you by --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021[edit]

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

15:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 43[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021

  • New Library Card designs
  • 1Lib1Ref May

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

13:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Growth Newsletter #18[edit]

15:23, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-May 2021[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the May 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Wikipedia News[edit]

Tip of the Month[edit]

This tip is one of the many ways to combat spam on Wikipedia:

  • On Wikipedia, articles either meet the General Notability Guideline or not. When you come across a new article, it is extremely important to determine if it is a real article, or just a spam article. Start with a search on Google, for reliable sources, if you get none in return, then look at the article for non-NPOV content, also scan the references section in the article to see what sources it uses, and check the 'other languages' section and Wikidata to see if it is on other Wikipedias. If other Wikipedias have the same content and/or a CSD or AfD tag (WP:AFD) it is likely spam or not notable, so you can then nominate it for deletion to get input, remember that CSD criterion does not always apply to these articles depending on the content/contex. Also remember to check for copyright violations via earwig's

Memorials[edit]

  • SlimVirgin has sadly passed away this month, you can read more about SlimVirgin's passing here
  • Moroboshi also sadly passed away earlier this month.
Our condolences go out to the editors and their families, thank you for your work on Wikimedia projects.

Humour[edit]

  • Got blocked on the English Wikipedia because of your epic hacking skills? Start hacking other Wikimedia projects, they ca- This user account is currently locked across all Wikimedia projects.
  • This joke is a work in progress, so I might drop some hammers.


  • This joke is 2 spaces away, so a🔨n- woah that was close!

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • If you want to join TWW, please leave us a message!


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and stay safe! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 00:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Issue was sent you by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 00:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 21[edit]

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #2[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

Junior contributors comment completion rate across all participating Wikipedias
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Requesting your support[edit]

Hi John. I wanted to ask if you’d be willing to participate over here on a page about customer service software, where I have a COI. I posted a message a couple months ago and followed up with a couple editors but the page doesn’t seem to hold a lot of interest. Tskillin (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tskillin: I'm not sure that I have much time for this, but I am impressed by the amount of work you've put into the draft, based (quite correctly) on reliable sources. So, two comments:
  • I'm not convinced that separating corporate history from product history is ideal. Was that based on what you saw in other Wikipedia articles, and, if so, could I get a pointer or two?
  • The RP template is quite useful for book-length publications, but should be used for every citation. You've put page numbers (17-18) in the first use of the citation, but should not have, because that means that those pages (17-18) show up in every use of the core citation. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad you like the proposed draft. A lot of work went into being neutral and researching good sources. Based on your feedback I consolidated product and corporate history under the "History" section and removed the page number citations. The revised draft is located at the same link. Please let me know if you have any additional feedback. Tskillin (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John. Just checking in on this. Thanks very much. Tskillin (talk) 22:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-Special Notice[edit]

Hello. Thanks for subscribing to TheWikiWizard, as you may know, the next issue of TheWikiWizard, was supposed to be ready and delivered to your talkpage (or the page you subscribed to receive the newsletter) on the 20th. However, due to Tsugaru (User:つがる) being busy with exams, and having some problems logging into his Wikipedia account, the next Issue of TWW has been delayed. The next issue should be ready in around one weeks time. Thanks for your patience and understanding, and we hope you will enjoy the next issue! -- つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-June 2021[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the June 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Wikipedia News[edit]

  • The IRC channels used for Wikipedia have changed, you can read more on it here. While TWW was aware of this in the last issue, we decided to wait and publish this in this issue, when the issue is not as new any more, and more information has been developed.
  • There was quick interruption in editing on Wikipedia, that was to test server switching should an emergency happen, more details can be found here.

Humour[edit]

This section was written by CanadianOtaku --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁
  • Internet Explorer still thinks freenode is the best IRC service!
  • It has been proven that editing the article Cheese while eating Cheese is considered a WP:COI.
  • This joke has been donated to us from aliens, hopefully they learned UTF-8: £

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Thanks for your patience as we experienced delays in publishing this issue.


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

We hope you Enjoy this Issue and have a safe and happy summer! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This issue was sent to you by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 02:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

15:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 45[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021

  • Library design improvements continue
  • New partnerships
  • 1Lib1Ref update

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

16:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

19:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Read-only reminder[edit]

A maintenance operation will be performed on Wednesday August 25 06:00 UTC. It should only last for a few minutes.

Also during this time, operations on the CentralAuth will not be possible (GlobalRenames, changing/confirming e-mail addresses, logging into new wikis, password changes).

For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Please help your community to be aware of this maintenance operation. Thank you!

20:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard-Summer 2021[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the Summer 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard.

Wikipedia News[edit]

  • There is an election that is taking place, for the Wikikmedia Foundation, to read more about it click here
  • The Wikipedia Library, has made some updates to their terms of use. You can read more here
  • Wikimania took place this month!
  • There are a few new admins who have joined the Admin Team, congrats to them! Remember, if you see a use who you believe meets the criteria for adminship here, or on other projects (Please check that Wikipedia/Wikimedia Project's Adminship Criteria page, as they vary by project), you can give it a try and nominate them for adminship if they are okay with it!

Humour[edit]

Editors notes[edit]

  • I have been really busy with school so I was unable to write this issue for a long time. Thanks for your patience. :)
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and have a safe and happy summer! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Issue was sent to you by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 02:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2021[edit]

15:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Simon Brett[edit]

Hi, I have expanded the Simon Brett page to list all of his works after seeing your message on the Talk: page you left about 10 years ago, if you have some time could you please take a look at my edit and see if it is alright? Thanks in Advance, Urere ◉ ◉ (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Urere: Thank you for improving the article. I'm glad to hear that my ten-year-old suggestion did eventually bear fruit.
In hindsight, I should have suggested two categories, "Other novels", and "Non-fiction", rather than one ("Other"). And I note that according to https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/simon-brett/ , it looks like there is a fifth detective series, Decluttering, with two books so far. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 02:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

15:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021[edit]

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello John Broughton,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.


To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

18:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 46[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021

  • Library design improvements deployed
  • New collections available in English and German
  • Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Requesting Review/Feedback[edit]

Hi John. I was hoping you might have a minute to look at the "Issues" section on the Foxit Reader page (I work for Foxit). It is cited to forums, Github, a personal blog, etc. This source for example is extremely positive ("It is a small, fast, feature-rich & multilingual PDF tool") but is only cited for criticisms.

A lot of this content was added in response to my Talk page comments asking to trim poor sources in the original “Issues” section. I thought it would be really obvious that making half the page an "Issues" section using these sources was inappropriate, but the editor that responded said they were all fine. I tried to get a second opinion at RSN twice with no response. I was hoping you might take a look and tell me if I'm wrong. Alisafetic (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your support[edit]

I was hoping you might have a minute to review the “Software and services” section here I proposed for the Zendesk page with a disclosed COI about a month ago. The editor that approved most of my proposed changes said they were too busy with grad school. Tskillin (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:28, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

15:29, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

20:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard- October 2021[edit]

Hi, John Broughton! Here is the October 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard!

Wikipedia News[edit]

Humour[edit]

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Thank you for your patience, I was busy, and still am, so issues of TWW may be delayed.
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. Enjoy this Issue and have a safe and happy Halloween/October! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 00:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Growth Newsletter #19[edit]

18:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

20:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

20:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 47[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021

  • On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
  • Search tool deployed
  • New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed New Draft for Jon Baker Page[edit]

About 5 weeks ago I shared a proposed draft to rework the Jon Baker page to remove promotionalism (addressing the advert tags) and make the page more up-to-date. I haven’t been able to find any editors willing to review the draft for consideration and was hoping you might be willing to take a look. Kindest. Daizypeach (talk) 09:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:13, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

21:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard- December 2021[edit]

Hi, John Broughton! Here is the December 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard!

Humour[edit]

  • Christmas is here again, time to bug people to get you the stuff you really, really want! (Anyone going to get me some butter cookies, or that giant Costco teddy bear?)
  • If you don't like turkey, there's always the rotisserie chicken!
  • If you ate too much turkey and regret it, then you should have read the above message ;)

Wikipedia News[edit]

We don't have much to report this month, but we do have the following...
  • The Simple English Wikipedia has almost reached 200,000 articles!
  • Wikipedia Asian Month which took place in November, has finished. Now, all the articles are judged and then it is determined who gets the postcards, even if you don't get one, or didn't participate, there is always next year, and we thank you for everything you have done!
  • Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021 took place earlier this month, for elegible editors. (At the time of this writing it was still taking place, but I assumed by the time this issue was sent, it would have been finished - It is set to finish at December 6 2021 at 23:59 UTC )

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • I haven't forgotten about TWW ;) Don't worry.
  • TWW is in the process of getting a new main page, if you have any ideas, or would like to help, please shoot a message on the TWW talk page.
  • That's it for this issue! This is the last issue for 2021. See you all in 2022! Have a safe and happy holiday season!
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

Happy Holidays! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This issue was sent to you with the help of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 01:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

22:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 22[edit]

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

19:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

21:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 48[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

  • 1Lib1Ref 2022
  • Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard- Jan/Feb 2022[edit]

Hi, John Broughton! Here is the first issue of 2022 for the TheWikiWizard!

Humor[edit]

  • Since it's/was Lunar New Year, you can bug your boss at work for that extra fifty dollar bill ;)
  • New Year, New world, Same TWW :P
  • Did you work off that turkey? Don't worry, editing Wikipedia burns calories... I am pretty sure...

Wiki(p/m)edia News[edit]

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • We are combining two months' issues into one, to try out a new format. This is the first issue of 2022. Happy New Year!
  • That's it for this time, see you in the next issue!
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

Wishing you a good 2022! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This issue was sent to you with the help of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 01:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

19:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022[edit]

22:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

21:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Growth Newsletter #20[edit]

17:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

15:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 49[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

  • New library collections
  • Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 March 2022[edit]

19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Changes to Axos Financial[edit]

My name is Aubree and I work for Axos Financial. My predecessor Gfrostaxos has been trying to request changes to the Axos page since last November. He has gotten some responses, but few directly addressing the changes actually requested. He requested a smaller change here as requested to no avail. I was wondering if you would be willing to review that requested change and approve/decline or otherwise provide feedback. Anthompson44 (talk) 18:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-15[edit]

19:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - April 2022[edit]

Hi, John Broughton! Here is the April 2022 issue for the TheWikiWizard!

Humour[edit]

  • April 1 isn't April fools day if you say it isn't...
  • April Showers should bring May Money flowers! I'd be rich!
  • It's Spring again, Spring out of bed!

Wiki(p/m)edia News[edit]

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Sorry for missing the last issue!
  • Have a suggestion or want to help us? Let us know!
  • We wish all those in Ukraine and those affected by the war safety and peace :-)
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you in the next issue! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 19:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This message was sent to you automatically by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 19:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-16[edit]

23:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-17[edit]

22:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-18[edit]

19:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-19[edit]

15:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-20[edit]

18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022[edit]

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello John Broughton,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 817 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 861 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-21[edit]

00:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - May 2022[edit]

Hey, John Broughton! Here is the May 2022 issue for the TheWikiWizard!

Humor[edit]

  • What do May Showers bring?
  • May the 4th be with you doesn't work anymore, but I can say it again in less than a year!
  • If you love Wikipedia, and are editing it, is it a conflict of interest?

Wiki(P/M)edia News[edit]

  • A discussion took place in regards to the desktop design for certain Wikis. You can find more information here.
  • Tamzin, has had a successful RFA! Congrats!
  • Check out this Conversation that will be hosted by the team "Community Resilience and Sustainability"! You can find out more details about the meeting by clicking on the link.

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • We have a IRC Channel! Come by and say Hi! You can find us on Libra.Chat under the channel name #TheWikiWizard connect


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you in the next issue! (Remember, you can help us write our next issue!) --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 00:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-22[edit]

20:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Editing newsletter 2022 – #1[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for the multilingual newsletterLocal subscription list

New editors were more successful with this new tool.

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 50[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022

  • New library partner - SPIE
  • 1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-23[edit]

02:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-24[edit]

16:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-25[edit]

20:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022[edit]

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello John Broughton,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14618 articles, as of 16:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-26[edit]

20:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on![edit]

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-27[edit]

19:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #21[edit]

13:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-28[edit]

19:23, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard - July 2022[edit]

Hey, John Broughton! Here is the July 2022 issue for the TheWikiWizard!

Humour[edit]

  • It's less than 6 months till Christmas (I think...)
  • Start making the Christmas list! Never too early, or late for those who think Dec 26 is Dec 25 haha
  • If I had a dollar for every word I typed, the world would run out of money ;)

Wiki(p/m)edia News[edit]

  • The Japanese Wikipedia now uses the new vector skin! For those who speak Japanese or just want to take a look, check it out!
  • There is a conversation event that you can check out. More details on the link.
  • A meeting had taken place in regards to Interface of MediaWiki. More information of that meeting can be found here.

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Please note that due to me being busy/at times not much to report on Wiki(p/m)edia some issues of this newsletter may be skipped. Don't worry I haven't forgotten about it!
  • Sometimes during the delivery of the issue, the mass message extension sends it twice for some reason. Please note I only send them once and not twice. I apologise for the inconvenience this causes.
  • Remember that the Wikimedia Foundation also hosts other wikis too! So if you want to see what other wikis there are, give it a try! You might find something you like!


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you in the next issue! Have a great summer! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-29[edit]

22:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-30[edit]

19:26, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 51[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022

  • New library partners
    • SAGE Journals
    • Elsevier ScienceDirect
    • University of Chicago Press
    • Information Processing Society of Japan
  • Feedback requested on this newsletter
  • 1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-31[edit]

21:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022[edit]

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello John Broughton,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-32[edit]

19:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-33[edit]

21:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message[edit]

Hi John Broughton,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-34[edit]

00:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Editing news 2022 #2[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Graph showing 90-minute response time without the new tool and 39-minute response time with the tool
The [subscribe] button shortens response times.

The new [subscribe] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-35[edit]

23:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022[edit]

Board of Trustees election[edit]

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-36[edit]

23:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-37[edit]

01:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Declared paid editors for hire[edit]

Hi! No idea if you're still maintaining this list, but if so I'd like to be added. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-38[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #22[edit]

17:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-39[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 52[edit]

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

  • New instant-access collections:
    • SpringerLink and Springer Nature
    • Project MUSE
    • Taylor & Francis
    • ASHA
    • Loeb
  • Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard- September 2022[edit]

Hey, John Broughton! Here is the September 2022 Issue for the TheWikiWizard in October! We apologize for the delay.

Humor[edit]

  • It's time for Christmas, summer is coming to an end
  • What are you giving Santa for Chirstmas? (He told me to for you to leave more cookies and the Halloween Candy)
  • Halloween, give out money instead :P

Wiki(p/m)edia News[edit]

  • A discussion in regards to the new vector skin on EN Wikipedia had taken place, you can find it here
  • The Foundation Elections occurred learn more here
  • Quite a few successful RFA's took place, some include Z1720, and Dan Cherek! Congrats to all the successful RFA's!

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Thanks for your patience as we are late with issues, you can join us if you want to help out!
  • Please note that sometimes the system may deliver this twice to you, but I only send it once
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you in the next issue! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 00:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-40[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-41[edit]

14:07, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Tech News: 2022-42[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-43[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2022[edit]

Tech News: 2022-44[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:13, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-45[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-46[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:53, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 53[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

  • New collections:
    • Edward Elgar
    • E-Yearbook
    • Corriere della Serra
    • Wikilala
  • Collections moved to Library Bundle:
    • Ancestry
  • New feature: Outage notification
  • Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-47[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-48[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #23[edit]

20:57, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-49[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - December 2022[edit]

Hey, John Broughton! Here is the December 2022 issue for the TheWikiWizard! We've been dormant for a few months!

Humor[edit]

  • How many times will you write 2022 in 2023??
  • Don't write Christmas Cards/do gift shopping in December, do it in the summer!

Wiki(p/m)edia News[edit]

Not much to report this issue, but we do have these to report!

  • Quite a few RFAs took place since the last issue of this newsletter. You can view more here!
  • The Voting for a sound logo is taking place on Wikimedia Commons, head over to that link to find out more!
  • The Arbitration Committee Elections is happening on the English Wikipedia. (The elections may have finished by the time you see this message, please check the page for the date and time of the election deadline)

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Have a great holiday and new years! We'll see you in 2023.


Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you next time. Happy Holidays! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 02:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This issue was delivered to you with MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on 02:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-50[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2022-51[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 January 2023[edit]

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Tech News: 2023-02[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help with redundant and copyrighted edits[edit]

Hi. I am Prerna Gupta. A couple years ago I proposed some improvements to the page about me following COI policy and you chipped in here. An anonymous IP address recently added some content I think is redundant, promotional, and copy/paste of copyrighted content. I was hoping you would be willing to chip-in again at the discussion I started here. 138.118.80.34 (talk) 16:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2023[edit]

Tech News: 2023-03[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 54[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

  • New collections:
    • British Newspaper Archive
    • Findmypast
    • University of Michigan Press
    • ACLS
    • Duke University Press
  • 1Lib1Ref 2023
  • Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-04[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-05[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #24[edit]

14:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 February 2023[edit]

Tech News: 2023-06[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 10:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-07[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 February 2023[edit]

Tech News: 2023-08[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing news 2023 #1[edit]

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

  1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
  2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

Screenshot showing the talk page design changes that are currently available as beta features at all Wikimedia wikis. These features include information about the number of people and comments within each discussion.
Some of the upcoming changes

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for Discussion tools.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

Daily edit completion rate by test group: DiscussionTools (test group) and MobileFrontend overlay (control group)

An A/B test for Discussion tools on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with Discussion tools. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - February 2023[edit]

Hey, John Broughton! Here is the February 2023 issue for the TheWikiWizard!

Humor[edit]

  • Have you finished raking up those leaves from fall?
  • Are you making your list yet for next Christmas? Only 10ish more months to go! It's never too early ;-)

Wiki(P/M)edia News[edit]

  • Wikipedia (EN) has a new look! Remember, if you prefer the old look and are logged in, you can go to preferences to change back to the old vector skin!
  • WMF (Wikimedia Foundation) is going to update it's terms of use, you can find out more here
  • There is a planned test that will take place with the servers, and it may affect your ability to make changes for a period of time, more information can be found here
  • We've got some new RFA's (Requests for Adminship) on EN Wikipedia that took place since the last issue!

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Happy 2023! This is the first issue of the year!
  • If you ever want to help out with TWW please let us know! Please note TWW issues may be delayed, but we haven't forgotten about TWW!
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you next time. We hope you have a great 2023! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 01:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This issue was delivered to you by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 01:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-09[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pure Storage page edits[edit]

Hi John. My name is Zac and I work for a flash storage company called Pure Storage. I disclosed a COI and requested some changes here including correcting that the Purity operating system is used in most, but not all, of the company's products, and correcting/updating the list of major product families.

You'll see there that there's been some back and forth already with other editors and I have addressed all the feedback received. However, it's not clear what the next step is in terms of getting corrections/updates actually implemented. Do you have time to chip in? If there's something else I need to do or some other feedback I need to address, please let me know. ZacBond (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-10[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-11[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 55[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

  • New bundle partners:
    • Newspapers.com
    • Fold3
  • 1Lib1Ref January report
  • Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-12[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-13[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #25[edit]

13:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-14[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-15[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lenovo IdeaPad Edits[edit]

Hi John Broughton. I work for Lenovo. I disclosed a COI and started a conversation at Talk:IdeaPad#Potential_Revisions_to_Page about a year ago about the page being flooded with out-dated technical specs of individual products. I shared a table similar to what's on ThinkPad#Current_model_lines that would bring it up-to-date and make the page less unwieldly. It seems like editors generally support incorporating the table, but nobody has actually made any edits. I understand that I'm not supposed to make edits myself. My hope is that you might be willing to chime in and make whatever edits you deem best for Wikipedia? StuartGill (talk) 15:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-16[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-17[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-18[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-19[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-20[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-21[edit]

16:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 56[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

  • New partner:
    • Perlego
  • Library access tips and tricks
  • Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - May 2023[edit]

Hey, John Broughton! Here is the May 2023 edition for the TheWikiWizard!

Humor[edit]

  • Now is the time to start writing those Christmas cards and do the Christmas shopping! Come December, you can sit back and edit Wikipedia! ;)
  • When it snows in December/Winter, stock up the snow in your freezer, so when it gets hot you can do a snowball fight in the summer!

Wiki(P/M)edia News[edit]

  • A conversation with trustees event took place on the 18th of May. You can read more details on the event here!
  • On the English Wikipedia some RFAs which took place the past few months. You can see the full details at the RFA main page.
  • There is a event (Conference) that is taking place in city of Belgrade. More details on the event can be found by clicking on the link!

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • I apologies for the delay in the issues, however I can guarantee you that I am always thinking of TWW and haven't forgotten about it :) School's so busy!
  • If you want to help out TWW, let me know!
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

  • Please note: Sometimes the system may deliver the issue twice for you, but I only send it once. I'm not sure what the issue is so I apologize for this.
Hope you enjoyed this issue! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 00:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #26[edit]

15:14, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-22[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-23[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great minds think alike—we saw and used the same source to update the article, and had the same reaction to the positioning of the section. I went ahead and overwrote your fixed-up version with my own more extensively fixed-up version. So I think I owe you an apology, and you may want to check for any stupid typos I made. Yngvadottir (talk) 02:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yngvadottir: I like your version more than mine - I was just passing through, making minimal edits, plus adding a citation. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-24[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 14:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

Tech News: 2023-25[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-26[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol needs your help![edit]

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello John Broughton,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-27[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-28[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-29[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 57[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

  • Suggestion improvements
  • Favorite collections tips
  • Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-30[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 02:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-31[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #27[edit]

12:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-32[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-33[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 05:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-34[edit]

15:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-35[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 13:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP Block - Appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

John Broughton (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm blocked from editing because I'm connecting from IP address 173.222.3.121 . I'm using a Verizon hotspot (borrowed from a library) to connect to the internet, and so the IP address is in no way a personal one. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm marking you as WP:IPBE for a year. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 22:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-36[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-37[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 58[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

  • New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
  • Tech tip: Filters
  • Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-38[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached (see WP:STATUSQUO).

Please remember that as the person attempting to make a change to the article, the WP:ONUS is on you to justify the change, and to get a consensus if it is disputed; and again, please do not edit war. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: I was hoping that you'd actually explain the reasons for your revert; apparently you're reluctant to do that. So I'll post something on the article talk page, as you request, in the hopes that you'll actually explain your objections. Also, FYI, (1) WP:BRD is an essay, not a guideline or policy, and (2) WP:ONUS doesn't have anything to do with this discussion (please follow the link). -- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:06, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted because you removed pertinent and sourced information from the article without a consensus to do so, and your explanation for the removal was not relevant.
And yeah, I've been here 18 years with over 300,000 edits, I know BRD is an essay. I also know that the vast majority of Wikipedia editors follow it, including almost all admins. Did you known that removing sourced material without a consensus to do so is considered by those admins to be WP:Disruptive editing? Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Beyond My Ken: No, I didn't know that removing sourced material without a consensus was considered disruptive editing. (Removing "pertinent" information seems disruptive to me, but of course "pertinent" is a subjective criteria, while "sourced" is not.) Would you mind pointing out the specific wording in WP:Disruptive editing to which you're referring? (I can't find that.) -- John Broughton (♫♫) 19:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-39[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - September 2023[edit]

Hello, John Broughton! Here is the September 2023 for the TheWikiWizard!

Wiki(p/m)edia News[edit]

  • On the EN Wikipedia, there were 4 successful RFAs between the period of July and September! Congrats to the candidates! Also on Simple English Wikipedia, they had 1 successful RFA in August!
  • For those wondering why you were unable to edit for a period of time on 20th September, there was a server testing going on. You can follow the link to read more. We will always inform you here if one of these kinds of tests is going to take place, or has taken place. You can also head on over to the Meta Wiki main page, information on these kinds of tests will always be displayed there.
  • Did you know you that Wikimedia Commons has monthly photo challenges? You can check out more here!
  • The USA has viewed Wikipedia 4 Billion times in August!
  • The Talysh Wikipedia was recently created!

Humor[edit]

  • It's almost fall again! (or is it already?) Don't fall on fallen leaves!
  • One moment it's raining, the next its too hot. Welcome to fall!

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • Quite a bit has happened since our last issue! Thanks for your patience during our gap of inactivity between issues!
  • Thank you for reading TWW!
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

See you again in the next issue! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 15:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This issue was sent to you by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-40[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-41[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 14:37, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #28[edit]

Trizek_(WMF) Talk 23:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-42[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-43[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-44[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive[edit]

Hello John Broughton:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-45[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-46[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023[edit]

Tech News: 2023-47[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 59[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

  • Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
  • Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-48[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Growth team newsletter #29[edit]

18:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023[edit]

Tech News: 2023-49[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-50[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 02:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2023-51[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of Rashmika Mandanna[edit]

Can you please assess the class rating of the article of Rashmika Mandanna as I have essentially redone the entirety of it. Thank you! Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 20:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Iknowthingsaboutstuff1: Sure, done. Thank you for all the work you did to improve the article. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 20:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 23[edit]

Tech News: 2024-02[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-03[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-04[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 60[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

  • Three new partners
  • Google Scholar integration
  • How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TheWikiWizard - February 2024[edit]

Humour[edit]

  • Does editing Wikipedia burn calories? If it does, does it count as exercise? ;)
  • TWW is back from being long dormant. It was a nice "Hibernation" lol.

Wiki(P/M)edia news[edit]

  • Voting regarding the Universal Code of Conduct is taking place on Meta Wiki. More information can be found via the link
  • EN Wikipedia has a few new Administrators following their successful RFA!
  • Information on the upcoming Steward Election on Meta can be found here
  • A new feature called Reference Previews has been created. More information: here

Editor's Notes[edit]

  • I apologise for the delay, I was not able to edit until recently.
  • I hope to have TWW published more frequently from this issue onwards. Ideally at least every 2 months. Since its near the end of the month, I decided to name this issue February.
  • We are always looking for help! If you would like to help out, please let us know!
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.

Hope you enjoyed this issue! --つがる Talk to つがる:) 🍁 04:25, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This issue was sent to you by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 04:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-05[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive![edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome John Broughton! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:52, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Tech News: 2024-06[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment of Maya Ali[edit]

Can you please assess the class rating of the article of Maya Ali as I have essentially redone the entirety of it. Thank you Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iknowthingsaboutstuff1: Done. You might want to revise this sentence:
According to Maya Ali, her father was against her working in the entertainment industry and did not talk to her for six years and According to Maya Ali, his father was died in 2016 and she was in very gulit why she choose showbiz industry
-- John Broughton (♫♫) 19:04, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my, I'm so sorry, I evidently didn't check clearly enough. I've altered the sentence. What do I have to do to get the article to B-Class? Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Iknowthingsaboutstuff1: I've created a page - Talk:Maya Ali/B Class Discussion - with comments about wording and other issues. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for taking time to make this! I’ve made all possible corrections but the resources available for Pakistani actors is very limited so I was unable to find anything more on Ali’s degree, but otherwise everything has been completed. Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 00:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-07[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 05:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-08[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-09[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 24[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024[edit]

Tech News: 2024-10[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 61[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

  • Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
  • 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-11[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-12[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 17:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-13[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-14[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 03:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024[edit]

Hello John Broughton,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-15[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-16[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment of Rashmika Mandanna to GA Class[edit]

Hi, I was wondering if you could please reassess the article for Rashmika Mandanna as I have made alterations that I believe allow it to qualify for GA-Class, if these are not enough, could you please provide notes as to where I can make further improvements? Thanks. 19Arham (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@19Arham: I'm not a GA reviewer, so I can't help you directly. But there is a standard process for getting an article assessed as GA-class - see Wikipedia:Good article nominations. I recommend that you post something there. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay, thank you anyway 19Arham (talk) 06:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-17[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 62[edit]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

  • IEEE and Haaretz now available
  • Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
  • Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Growth News, April 2024[edit]

18:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)