User talk:K6ka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Tech News: 2024-15[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive IP[edit]

I noticed you reverted an edit of 2605:8d80:13bc:131c:9917:6bac:cc7e:4dae, they have been extremely disruptive towards any of Sokolov's work and on the Battle of Kursk page, and continue to do so, as you can check the Battle of Kursk page and see that the IPs are in the same location of Toronto. Reaper1945 (talk) 15:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 macOS Big Sur.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 macOS Big Sur.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
106 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Alternative media (U.S. political right) (talk) Add sources
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Borland Kylix (talk) Add sources
685 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C JetBrains (talk) Add sources
2,628 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Buddy Ebsen (talk) Add sources
1,092 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Record producer (talk) Add sources
99 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C C++Builder (talk) Add sources
188 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Component-based software engineering (talk) Cleanup
569 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Carl Benjamin (talk) Cleanup
566 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Respiration (physiology) (talk) Cleanup
231 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Patriot Prayer (talk) Expand
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Honey Hunt (talk) Expand
1,872 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Proud Boys (talk) Expand
1,089 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Automation (talk) Unencyclopaedic
93 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Terrorgram (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,272 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B The Horus Heresy (talk) Unencyclopaedic
161 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Far-right politics in the United Kingdom (talk) Merge
120 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Epik (talk) Merge
246 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Antisemitism in the United States (talk) Merge
512 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Tin Woodman (talk) Wikify
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Canarium indicum (talk) Wikify
21 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Alexander Raven Thomson (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Marie Lannoo (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Twyla Exner (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Charles Coleman (music producer) (talk) Orphan
48 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Haakon Forwald (talk) Stub
41 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ghost skin (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Phoenix Object Basic (talk) Stub
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Cantera (stone) (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Revolutionary Conservative Caucus (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Absolutely Productions (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed account[edit]

Hi K6ka :) I was randomly scrolling through edit filter hits & I came across this note you left on Draddex’s talk. I just thought I should leave you a message; as you mentioned in that diff that you’d lifted the block on the account, but it still appears to be blocked.

Apologies if I’ve missed anything. All the best. ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 12:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A smart kitten: Oops! Thanks for catching that; I have now actually unblocked the user. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About your block of 148.69.166.217[edit]

Their two edits at Niggerhead need revision delete for hate speech.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skywatcher68:  Donek6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2024)[edit]

Hello, K6ka. The article for improvement of the week is:

Antarctic

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Fire safety • Jean Gabin


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Tech News: 2024-16[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besins healthcare page[edit]

Hello,

I noticed you reverted the changes I made on the Besins Healthcare page, citing a lack of adherence to Wikipedia's tone guidelines. While I understand the importance of maintaining a consistent tone, I believe the revisions I made were in line with improving the article's accuracy and relevance.

I'm open to constructive feedback and suggestions on how to better align with Wikipedia's standards, I would appreciate to not see my work be cancelled instead have some suggestion to make it fit the tone.

Best regards,

Vic01toire

Vic01toire (talk) 07:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vic01toire, your work is not "cancelled"; it was reverted because it was not written in the encyclopedic tone that Wikipedia is written in. Reverting an edit does not mean "cancellation", it means someone else disagrees with it and feels the article was better before. Please see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for guidance on this; Wikipedia is written by many people who will all eventually disagree with something at some point, and Wikipedia is built as a result of people with differences working to resolve disputes. Using terms such as "cancelled" is simply not correct and may inhibit your ability to resolve disputes, because it implies that you believe other people have an agenda to silence you.
Your edit here looks like something found on the company's "About Us" page, not something in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is written in the style of an academic paper, so it presents the facts "with a straight face", not with the perspective of an employee at the company. For an example of encyclopedic tone, see a featured article and take note of the way it is written. It also removed a lot of sourced material, particularly those in the "Controversy" section; Wikipedia is about verifiability, not truth. Information that is well supported by reliable sources is what's reported on Wikipedia, not material that something believes to be truthful. Even if you think something isn't true based on your own perspective, that's not justification to remove it from Wikipedia if it's been supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia is a reflection of what reliable sources report on a topic, not an independent curator of information.
You may find it difficult to write about Wikipedia on these terms because you're receiving payment for these contributions; as such, you have a conflict of interest. Most Wikipedia editors are impartial to the topics they write about, which makes it easier to write in an encyclopedic tone. You'll need to keep your own biases in mind when drafting content about this company.
I've provided you with a lot of links to policy pages above. You may also be interested in the Teahouse, an environment for newcomers to ask questions; help on writing your first article; and the Five Pillars of Wikipedia, which summarize the core principles.
k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]