User talk:Kenh37

February 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Charlie's Angels worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.    SIS  22:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Charlie's Angels, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.    SIS  22:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

September 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to CN Tower, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 23:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at St. Marys River (Michigan–Ontario), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Hammer (2019 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hammer (2019 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick Duffy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matlock. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

March 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lauri Hendler, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hammer (2019 film)

Hello, Kenh37. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hammer (2019 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Editorializing, adding unsourced terms

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:17, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Tripod sites do not meet WP:RS

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gil Gerard, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:BURDEN, reliable sources need to be cited for verification. Waxworker (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order, but please remember that Wikipedia isn't a place for walkthroughs, cheats, lists of game content or detailed instructions on how to play a game. For more information please read the video game guideline. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 06:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Native American vs indigenous

With your edit, with the edit summary "being an encyclopedia, it must be correct AND respectful to the people, not "common the CORRECT and respectful term, just as Indian is not such, is indigenous", you changed... the reference. The article referenced is titled "Fargo's Zahn McClarnon on Hanzee's Backstory and the Types of Roles Native Americans Get Onscreen" and not "Fargo's Zahn McClarnon on Hanzee's Backstory and the Types of Roles indigneous Americans Get Onscreen". Your own opinion of the term doesn't mean you can change the common meaning of it. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zahn McClarnon. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

You are changing a reference, that cites an article that actually uses the term "Native American". Stop changing it, please. You are being disruptive. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

there is proper English and then there are those who do not know proper English (aka colloquial/copmmon). It seems to me you have taken a stance in the Native American name controversy. That doesn't mean however your opinion on the matter means other usages of the term are somehow incorrect, especially when it's about a reference. Don't like seeing "Native American" in an article title? Reach out to Vulture. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 21:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)