User talk:Medaltables

Medaltables, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Medaltables! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

You appear to have lots of usernames[edit]

Hi. It's been noticed that you appear to be editing under many usernames. Whilst this is sometimes allowed, in your case it does not appear to be currently productive. As such, the other accounts User:PAGEOFLEGAMES, User:Medaltables2, User:Holidayof2017, User:OlympicsPAGE1, User:KABBEY, User:PARACLHIANMEPBIAOLNLSSHSISPSS and User:OlympicOverview have been blocked. You will need to edit from this account only. The sandboxes of the other account have been moved to subpages of this account. You can find them at by clicking this link. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 00:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 05:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on March 2013 United Kingdom Blizzard[edit]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/weather/9950731/Drawn-out-winter-may-have-caused-thousands-of-extra-deaths.html. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Thank you for the information Dianna. I didn't know this so it will be helpful for me in the future Thank You. 23:14, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 23:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've made literally thousands of edits creating pages and pages full of total nonsense and junk in your user space. I've deleted it all, and as it seems to be your sole purpose here, blocked you indefinitely. (Disruption including all the socks used as indicated above by Black Kite). Courcelles (talk) 23:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Medaltables (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked because previously, I have been blocked and I have mended my ways. I have created new pages that I have recived no complaints from except for the March 2013 UK Blizzard page on which I was told about and then was fixed. Granted in the past my editing was indeed disruptive but you must see that i have changed my ways and I only want to edit articles for the good. If you look at my edit history (if there is such a thing) you will see that I have changed for the better. If anybody can help, it would be much appreciated thank you. 23:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Medaltables (talk) 23:19, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:53, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked? As whom? Because this account has ever been blocked. Also, you were playing with your userspace trash as recently as ‘’yesterday’’. Courcelles (talk) 23:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Courcelles, if you read into what Black Kite said about me (it was on a page with a what load of other people had done) he basically said that he would allow me to edit as long as my edits are good and not harmful. This was December last year and since then, I have vastly improved. I have only received one complaint (which you can see above). 00:16, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 1997 United Kingdom heat wave for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1997 United Kingdom heat wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1997 United Kingdom heat wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 11:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]