Talk:Lockman Hole
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Deleted and restored - watch out for copyright issues[edit]
Lockman Hole was deleted in the Marshallsumter incident as documented at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Astronomy/User:Marshallsumter_Incident_Article_Fix-up_Coordination_Page
Based on Wikipedia:Requested articles/Natural sciences/Astronomy and cosmology and Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL it seems that it would indeed be worth an article, so it was restored, first to my user page. Please look for and fix any of the sort of copyright violations that led to the ban. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 05:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Needed: clarity on what neutral hydrogen absorbs[edit]
How is the lockmanhole different from the rest of the sky? What extragalactic wavelengths get thru that don't get thru elsewhere? Exactly how big is it, how does the clarity vary in different parts of the hole, etc? ★NealMcB★ (talk) 04:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Desired: nice image of the hole[edit]
Where can we get a suitably-licensed image, like Figure 2, Plate 31 from the Snoden paper ★NealMcB★ (talk) 04:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Pieces to clear[edit]
- «…clearly visible on a plot of H I column density.»
The link is to H I region, o'k, but I was just there and... I'd rather like to get about the "plot" and what that "column density" is. Than dig another time through the whole that other article... WDYT? Lincoln Josh (talk) 16:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- I went ahead and removed this line. While I know what it was trying to say, I don't think it added anything of value to the article. James McBride (talk) 07:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lockman Hole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124090146/http://www.mpe.mpg.de/heg/www/VAB2010/2010_05-18_FB_PB_high_neu1%20131.pdf to http://www.mpe.mpg.de/heg/www/VAB2010/2010_05-18_FB_PB_high_neu1%20131.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 5 January 2018 (UTC)