User talk:Ebiobificent

Standard discretionary sanctions notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Woodroar (talk) 05:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Not a problem! I replied on my Talk page, but I'll copy it here as well (if you want to continue the discussion, feel free to reply at either place):

Sure! It's a standard notification that articles related to the Gamergate controversy–"(a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed"–are subject to discretionary sanctions to minimize disruption. In other words, it's a "head's up, these articles tend to get heated so please make sure you're familiar with Wikipedia policies and guidelines". It doesn't mean you've done anything wrong. Although I would suggest reading WP:BRD, which contains plenty of good advice regarding collaborative editing. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 05:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

According to some sources, it was her name. But as discussed at Talk:Zoë Quinn#Birth Name (and in the archives, as well), there are reasons why we may not want to include it in the article. Most are due to the very strict requirements we have on articles about living persons. Woodroar (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

I understand where you're coming from, but...it's complicated. WP:V, our core policy on verifiability, at one point stressed "verifiability, not truth" before that bit got rolled into its own essay at Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. But the sentiment remains. Our fundamental goal at Wikipedia is to summarize what reliable, third-party published sources say about things. This usually means they're facts–though not always, of course–but it also means they're important. This (theoretically) keeps us from fighting over the nature of truth, so we don't have articles about the perpetual motion machine some crank built in their basement because "I know it's true because I built it and it works". But it also keeps our articles from getting filled with trivial garbage. It may be absolutely true that Zoë Quinn ate Wheaties for breakfast, but if no reputable source deems that fit to publish, then neither should we. And it appears to be the case that reputable publishers don't care about her previous name or names. I hope this helps! Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 06:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 10:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)