User talk:Mrblaze111

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

June 2021[edit]

Hello Mrblaze111. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:OtakuKart, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mrblaze111. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mrblaze111|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I note your declaration of basic COI. Please update this to reflect your paid editing status which you have declared at the Teahouse Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Timtrent this is my own company, and no one is paying me to write this. I'm trying to be as neutral as possible. I can ask third party to write an article on this, which is completely neutral, I guess, my connection with the company is the reason, I may be unable to write a neutral article. For me, it is neutral. Eitherway, thank you very much for the update on this.

MrBlaze111 (talk) 08:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You draw monies form your own company or, broadly construed, receive other reward. You are, ipso facto, a paid editor. Please extended your declaration. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 08:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Timtrent I don't want to be a paid editor either, would it be possible to delete the wiki draft I made? Apologies for the confusion I created.

MrBlaze111 (talk) 08:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will organise that for you. A presence on Wikipedia does nothing, neither positive nor negative, for your business Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 08:52, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand @Timtrent. I had all the relevant citations from independent sources, hence I wanted to setup a wikipedia page. Last time I applied, I was told to get quite a few independent wikipedia sources, which I did, and yet it was still rejected. MrBlaze111 (talk) 09:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the coverage fails the criteria even so. I think it is a case of it being too soon. Once coverage in major media happens that will be the time for the article, but it is far better to allow someone else to create it, and to be pleasantly surprised when it appears. Don't be scammed into paying an agency to create it, that almost always fails.

Concentrate on building your business. Wikipedia is a distraction you do not need. It adds no value to your business, it does not affect your search engine ranking (all links are rel=nofollow), and might pass you one person a month to your web site.

Instead, concentrate on a full social media profile. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:44, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Timtrent I really appreciate you taking your time in replying to me, unlike most mods, who straight up ignored it. I don't intend to pay anyone to create wikipedia page as it almost always doesn't end well.

I understand that the backlinks are nofollow and they have no impact, I'm not after the backlink, just a profile page for the website, even if there is no backlink back to my website, it is fine, just wanted the site to have a wikipedia page, as its like sort of a life long dream, since I started this back in 2015.

I already got my social profiles verified, and they are very active.

Once again, thank you very much! MrBlaze111 (talk) 10:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is a shame that folk have not responded to you. While they do not have a duty to respond it is a pity that they have not. I have a view that all editors should be made as welcome as time allows, and their needs and questions should be met and answered. The answers are not always what they hope to hear, but the world was ever thus.

When I was a kid I always wanted a car with twin exhaust pipes! It was far easier to fulfil that dream than it would be to have a Wikipedia page on any business I have run, or the book I have published. Indeed, none of these deserve a page.

Run your business with pride and fiscal care and it will grow and suddenly a page will appear because you will have created an entity that passes WP:NCORP, or yoiu wil be a very wealthy business owner, or both! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 10:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully one day, haha. I totally agree to what you said, getting a wiki page is really hard, near impossible.

Of course, which I'm doing and one day totally! Thank you very much @Timtrent. Have a good day man! :) MrBlaze111 (talk) 11:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OtakuKart (June 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. As a paid contributor, declared at this diff you need to understand that Wikipedia is a volunteer project. You receive a reward for your edits, and are thus expected to do your research properly and create useful drafts, and not ask others who are undid to spend hours reviewing your work. As a paid editor your job is to get it right

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OtakuKart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OtakuKart, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrblaze111! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kangvai[edit]

Hello, Mrblaze111. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kangvai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]