User talk:Tanbircdq

This is Tanbircdq's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tanbircdq.

Archives

• 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 •

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Tanbircdq, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Ray^Talk 23:48, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Nomination of Mahmud al-Rashid for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahmud al-Rashid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmud al-Rashid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri ^TALK 18:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17440 was submitted on Feb 01, 2017 22:13:03. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17748 was submitted on Mar 12, 2017 19:25:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For the five years I was editing the encyclopedia, and I have made large contributions in creating and improving many articles from a wide variety of subjects. I intend to generally make gnome edits to any article I come across for maintenance but have a particular interest in those of involving British Bangladeshis and Muslims. I've been blocked due to the result of SPI and AE against me. I acknowledge that the poor conduct leading up to my ban was unacceptable and I do not dispute to receiving the ban. Before this I had a good record of engaging and collaborating with other editors in good-fath. I understand that there are ways of resolving conflict resolution without resorting to behaviour which contravenes policy guidelines. During my block, I have made contributions on the Commons page. I feel I can make further constructive and productive contributions, therefore, should be give the opportunity to be allowed to return to the website.

Accept reason:

Accepted with unblock conditions, as described below. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a full history of your socking, including whether it continued after your block, and a deeper explanation of what led you to sockpuppetry/why I should believe you will not do it again. You were caught socking twice (one in 2014, a second time leading to your indefinite block), so I will need a thorough and candid explanation to have any chance of convincing me a continued block is not preventative. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A full history is available on the SPIs here and it did not continue after by block as I haven't edited Wikipedia since other than the contributions on the Commons page. The first instance was just stupidity. The second instance was due the frustration and injustice I felt after an editor accused me of having an agenda and I retaliated.

I've gone over nine months without editing, I'm not sure if I would now have time to be as active as I was before but there are potential Wikipedia pages which I was working on that I'd like to publish and there are many pages which I previously regularly edited that I would like to continue to update. I have absolutely intention of socking, should I be allowed to return, my contributions are likely to be fairly minimal in the future, I'll probably steer clear of conflicting topics on the whole and concentrate more time on topic areas which take less effort and patience to come into fruition. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any comments as the blocking admin, Coffee? I'm inclined to grant this request with a set of reasonable restrictions. I would specifically like clarification from you that this block was not an AE action, even though it originated from an AE thread. I assume this is the case because the duration exceeds that which can be applied via discretionary sanctions and I see no evidence it was logged. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: I can confirm that this was not an AE action. It seems quite reasonable to allow the WP:OFFER to apply here. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tanbircdq: Could you talk a bit more about what conflict led you to feel the need to sock? I'll offer you an unblock under a set of conditions, but I'd like to ensure the conditions help you return to regular and uncontroversial editing. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rob, sorry for the late reply. The conflict was that I added sourced material on a page, to which I was accused of having an agenda, however, despite this continued constructively contributing on the talk page only for the matter to be preemptively taken to ANI where it was shown I had done nothing wrong. After this I felt it untenable, and too disheartened and despondent to contribute on the page but I then regrettably decided to lash out. Tanbircdq (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Coffee and BU Rob13, I can't use talkback, I would appreciate if you'd please response here, thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per our policy on conditional unblocks, I'm willing to unblock you provided you agree to two restrictions. First, you are restricted to a single account indefinitely. This restriction may be lifted or modified by the community or by myself to allow another account to be used for some specific purpose. Note that this restriction bars you from even those use cases of alternate accounts that are typically considered legitimate (e.g. public-use accounts or bot accounts) unless the restriction is lifted or modified. Down the road, I'd be more than willing to entertain reasonable requests to lessen this restriction, if you have a compelling reason to use an alternate account. Second, for the next six months, any uninvolved administrator may re-block you at their discretion for any disruptive activities, up to and including an indefinite block. This more-or-less formalizes the reality for all standard offers; this is a last chance, and there are no warnings left to be had. If you find these restrictions acceptable, ping me and I'll unblock you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BU Rob13, I find these restrictions acceptable, thank you. Tanbircdq (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Religion and ethnicity in infoboxes[edit]

A little over a year ago, two RfCs concluded that religion and ethnicity should not be allowed in biographical infoboxes, see:

Please do not add them to infoboxes, as you did in this edit. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dilly Hussain listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dilly Hussain. Since you had some involvement with the Dilly Hussain redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mr. Bean into Mr. Bean (character). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on British Bangladeshi and Munsur Ali[edit]

Material you included in the above articles appears to have been copied from copyright web pages elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Also, as a result of this discussion, the Daily Mail is not longer considered a reliable source for this wiki. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Eesa Niamatullah[edit]

Hello! I am notifying interested projects and editors that I've listed Abu Eesa Niamatullah for discussion at AfD, and you were listed on the revision history page.

I invite you to contribute to the discussion. Mujaddouda (talk) 23:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swine/11 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swine/11. Since you had some involvement with the Swine/11 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would comment that if someone makes a nom based on "not in the target article," and you add it to the article while the nom discussion is going on, it might be nice to disclose that fact. UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lord Buckethead 1987.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lord Buckethead 1987.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lord Buckethead 1992.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lord Buckethead 1992.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 17:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahi Muqit[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mahi Muqit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.retinasurgeon.uk.com/about-mahi/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 01:50, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mahi Muqit. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 16:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nusaiba Mohammed[edit]

Hello, Tanbircdq. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nusaiba Mohammed, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 22:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive linking; ethnicity and religion; and social media external links[edit]

In this edit you reverted a number of improvements to article Ahsan Akbar:

You added numerous links to everyday words used in context, links that are very unlikely to be followed. Readers of the English-language Wikipedia are not stupid, they are sufficiently familiar with occupations like "writer", locations like the "United Kingdom", and concepts such as "British" that they do not need to read entire encyclopedia articles about them to understand the main topic, in this case the subject of a biography. WP:OVERLINKING elaborates on what overlinking is and why it is harmful to the encyclopedia.

There has been overwhelming consensus since RfCs Religion in biographical infoboxes and Ethnicity in infoboxes not to include religion or ethnicity in infoboxes. Your continued addition of them, despite this having been explained to you before, is not constructive. It does not change how the infoboxes are rendered, but does pollute maintenance categories and creates extra work for other editors. Please stop adding them. You are welcome to mention them in the body of the article if relevant and properly sourced.

Wikipedia is not here to promote every social media account of its subjects. Normally only one official link is included. Avoid adding more, particularly when they are prominently linked from the first official webpage. See WP:ELMINOFFICIAL for more information.

Remember that you do not own articles that you create, and should respect the contributions of fellow editors. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maya Ali (politician) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maya Ali (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Ali (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 13:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sami Yusuf - Wherever You Are.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sami Yusuf - Wherever You Are.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Corbyn[edit]

I have removed undue material from many biographical articles of individuals endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn which you added. Usually, this is because the additions are disproportionate to their real significance, reactive rather than active, and of limited notability. Sometimes, as with Peter Tatchell and George Monbiot, it misrepresents their variable response to Corbyn over the last two years. Philip Cross (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Ewan McGregor.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Do not add misleading edit summaries. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you appear to have ignored my message here. Following on from MidnightBlueMan's findings, I don't see what purpose this warning serves over this edit. You reverted my edit and then accused me of making disruptive edits, threatening me with being blocked etc over a "misleading" edit summary which if you used your common sense you could see the edit summary was a mistake but the edit was clearly a good faith minor edit that didn't require being reverted.

As it clearly says on my talk page template; Do not template me. I am a regular editor and I take your template as seriously rude behavior. I may even report you as a rude editor. Tanbircdq (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that I missed the finer details – I didn't even notice the message, to be fair, and for that I apologise. I was only concerned about the misleading edit summary, which I didn't realise was just a mistake – whenever and wherever I see something like that, I just take action, and in this case, I shouldn't have. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, apology accepted, take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn[edit]

Hi Tanbircdq, Thank you for your interest in Bernie Sanders. I just wanted to inform you out courtesy that I moved your contribution, regarding endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn under "Political positions" to Political positions of Bernie Sanders#Endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn. I did this because the other topics in "Political positions" in the main article are general in nature, as befits a main article, whereas his endorsement of Corbyn is a very specific stance, more appropriately covered in the latter arcticle. I hope that you will find this acceptable. I'll watch for your comment here, if it's OK with you. If not, let's discuss at Talk:Bernie Sanders. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 21:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HopsonRoad, thank you for having the courtesy to take the time to explain your removal. I do agree that Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn is quite specific as opposed to some of the other topics in the "political positions" section. However, I do think it's notable enough to have a general summary on main page with specific details elaborated on "political positions" page. I hope that you will agree that this is acceptable, take care. Tanbircdq (talk) 23:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, here, and your engagement at Bernie Sanders, Tanbircdq. I have a symmetry question for you. If mention of Sanders' endorsement of Corbyn is notable in the Sanders article, is it not also similarly notable in the Jeremy Corbyn article, where I find no mention? As an editor, I would not have considered either the giving or the receiving of the endorsement to be sufficiently notable for a main article, unless it had an effect on the course of events. Sanders, for instance, is making waves in the other political positions mentioned, whereas the first time that I learned of his endorsement of Corbyn was through your contribution. On Corbyn's end, do we suppose that Sanders' endorsement had a positive effect? I recognize from your citations that it made the news in Great Britain. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 13:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rakin Niass - The Road Less Travelled.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rakin Niass - The Road Less Travelled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rakin Niass - Clarity.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rakin Niass - Clarity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahlus-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah[edit]

Hi-- I've come across Ahlus-Sunnah wa’l-Jama’ah after another editor started adding links to it in various article. The article is a WP:CFORK of Sunni Islam. The phrase is the formal Arabic term for Sunni Islam, and I see nothing in the sources cited there to indicate that it is commonly used in English to refer to some denomination that is distinct from what is normally referred in English-language RSs as Sunni Islam. Please see the citations with quotes in Sunni Islam (whose Arabic counterpart, by the way, is titled أهل السنة والجماعة). I can see that you've put significant work into this article and understand that you may be disappointed by its becoming a redirect. You may want to consider whether some content there is suitable for merging into Sunni Islam. I've considered it myself, but I couldn't find any complementary content there based on solid academic sources. Eperoton (talk) 00:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aminul Islam Bappi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aminul Islam Bappi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aminul Islam Bappi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdur Rahman Madani for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdur Rahman Madani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rahman Madani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aladin Ali[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aladin Ali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sonata (play)[edit]

Hi Tanbirdcdq, regarding this edit, please be aware that the "International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature" is a spammy and likely predatory journal. It's published by "ARC Journals", listed by Beall here. See also Predatory open access publishing. I encourage you to not use such articles and to remove them from Wikipedia articles if you see them. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 14:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Scottish motivational speakers[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Scottish motivational speakers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Dennis Skinner: Nature of the Beast[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Dennis Skinner: Nature of the Beast—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. I would suggest keeping your article as the main one, copying any missing information from Nature of the Beast (Film) before turning it into a redirect to your article. Thank you. Certes (talk) 00:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Tanbircdq. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mahi Muqit) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Mahi Muqit, Tanbircdq!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian-American films[edit]

Hi

I hope you are the right person for this.

I was looking at Category:Indian-American films on Wikipedia - it would be really good if you could update as it's 3 years old.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.246.119 (talk) 20:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Tanbircdq (talk)

Nomination of Nazia Ali for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nazia Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazia Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 20:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror[edit]

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iftekhar Ahmed for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iftekhar Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iftekhar Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emdad Rahman for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emdad Rahman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emdad Rahman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Shoebox (musical)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Shoebox (musical), Tanbircdq!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:45, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Positive Money[edit]

Thanks for finding some valid content for this article. One thing of concern, however. The bit about Dyson founded it after reading a book is WP:UNDUE. It might belong in Dyson's biography if he says that this was a key moment in his intellectual or political development, but it is not of encyclopedic interest in an article about the organization. Every organization, after all, is founded by individuals acting out of knowledge and belief. It is WP:SYNTH to associate the author of a published book with Dyson or with Positive Money in this way. If the author has made any statements about Positive Money, that would be a different matter and those statements might be due weight in the Positive Money article. Please remove this bit about the book that you have just re-instated. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 23:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message about your on about whether the origins of how the organisation was founded should be included on the article. However, as you can clearly see from the diff that I have not "re-instated" this content and the last revision shows this content was already in the article.

If you have concerns about this then I suggest that you take this to the talk page rather than canvassing me directly. Thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aspire (political party) councillors has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Aspire (political party) councillors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Yusuf Islam albums has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Yusuf Islam albums, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hoult[edit]

Hey, could you talk back at the article's talk page? Thank you. VedantTalk 20:04, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anwara Ali[edit]

The article Anwara Ali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 09:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi, im Tiberius. I saw one of your edits on the article Jeremy Corbyn and thought i'd check out your user-page. According to your page you are a Bangladeshi socialist, what i want to ask about is wether you are a member/affiliate/supporter of any particular political party? Tiberius Jarsve (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no I'm not a member, affiliate or supporter of any political party in Bangladesh. Tanbircdq (talk) 12:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thatcher[edit]

Hi. Just look at the infobox. Where does the title "Prime Minister of the United Kingdom" appear? Nowhere, that's where. An insane outcome. That's why I've reverted your edit twice. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 22:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RFC On new article title, Antisemitism in the Labour Party[edit]

Their is currently a RFC discussion on renaming the article: "Alleged Antisemitism in the Labour Party"

If you care to respond, [1] is open for discussion and opinions, thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Positive Money[edit]

I suggest you read the instructions and conditions for removing the notability tag. You are joining an edit war that's been waged over an extended period by Single Purpose Accounts and sockpuppets. What is the array of independent, reliable sources written directly about this organization that you believe establishes notability beyond all doubt? If you have such references, please add them and their associated content to the article. If not, as the instructions say, raise your concerns on talk but do not remove - or in this case please undo your removal - of the template. The purpose of the template is to attract editors to add valid well-sourced content to the article, and premature removal thwarts that objective. SPECIFICO talk 21:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"beyond all doubt"? This is not a court of law. This is Wikipedia. You are straining too hard to impose your beliefs. Reissgo (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Talk:Labour Party (UK)#Further_information:_Antisemitism_in_the_Labour_Party please have a read of the talk page to understand the situation. Alssa1 (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

help[edit]

hi, I need help to post a pic with an article. for som e reason it's not working. it keep referring me to wiki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abongsristy (talk • contribs) 02:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abongsristy, you can upload images by following the steps on Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. Thanks. Tanbircdq (talk) 16:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Voice for Labour[edit]

You created a page Jewish Voice for Labour. Please could you re-examine it. There are editors trying to add partisan quotes about members of JVC. The page needs looking at by a rather more objective editor. Garageland66 (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLP issues on British politics articles arbitration case opened[edit]

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 22, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1RR violation[edit]

This is your first revert (although partial). This is your second revert in less than 24 hours. Revert yourself or I'll report you to AE.--יניב הורון (Yaniv) (talk) 00:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom[edit]

As a trusted and impartial editor, I would like to ask you to take a look at this page Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom. There are editors on this page who seem to have an agenda which is to place responsibility for most child abuse in the United Kingdom on men of Asian/Muslim identity. Garageland66 (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I object strongly to your allegation that I have a racist agenda and insist that you withdraw it. Perhaps if you learned how to add material to an article without cherry picking quotes and using synthesis to make sources say what you want them to say rather than what they actually say, we'd all be getting along much more pleasantly. Neil S. Walker (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Snowded: Ping also. Neil S. Walker (talk) 11:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've accused no one of having a racist agenda. However, I have been falsely accused of cherry picking. Try not to invent accusations and try to stay cool.Garageland66 (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Garageland66:Learn to use the talk page and stop making accusations, not to mention taking your own advice. Also be aware that lobbying individual editors when you are in dispute on another article is frowned on and with your block history I would steer clear of it -----Snowded ^TALK 11:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Garageland66, I'm sure you meant well but it's best not to WP:CANVAS other editors on talk pages in this way but better to use three pings with a neutral statement then I'm sure everyone will appreciate that you have made efforts at the right place.

Neil S Walker, I don't believe that your name was mentioned here.

Snowded, please don't bring up editors previous block history. Another editors was warned not to do this at ANI recently.

Finally, I'd appreciate if you'd all please keep your disputes off my talk page before I have no option but making you all victims of WP:Whacking with a wet trout. Happy editing people, thank you, :-). Tanbircdq (talk) 13:03, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/BLP issues on British politics articles[edit]

Please take note of the following when presenting evidence:

In particular,

The Arbitration Committee reminds participating editors that any off-wiki information should be sent privately to arbcom-llists.wikimedia.org rather than being posted publicly on case pages. Arbitration clerks have been instructed to remove and revision delete any material related to off-wiki information from case pages.

Thanks! ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 23:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pilgrim State (book)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Pilgrim State (book) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/apr/13/women.mentalhealth. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nina Ruth Davis Salaman[edit]

A tag has been placed on Nina Ruth Davis Salaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/salaman-nina-ruth-davis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Lynching.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:What It Feels Like To Be Me.jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pilgrim State.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pilgrim State.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

All conflict articles under WP:1RR you have broken it on Criticism of the Israeli government Shrike (talk) 05:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Your recent editing history at Deepika Padukone shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jilani Chowdhury[edit]

The article Jilani Chowdhury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 23:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (What It Feels Like To Be Me) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating What It Feels Like To Be Me, Tanbircdq!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mumzy Stranger has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Mumzy Stranger, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 14:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Tulip Siddiq. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:51, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge that I've been blocked for copyright violations. I realise that I've been careless and/or complacent which had led to my editing falling short at times. I've tried to ensure that my general contributions are in good faith and it was not my intention to make these violations. However, I've read through WP:COPYVIO and WP:PARAPHRASE in detail and made myself familiar with the rules and guidelines. I make a resolution to be more careful in future and I would like to request to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Besides the copyright violations, you seem to have a history of sock puppetry. You were given a last chance unblock in 2017 under the condition that you cease all use of alternate accounts, even legitimate ones. As far as I can tell, you've kept to that, but you've been editing while logged out, presumably to evade scrutiny. This should be addressed in any future unblock requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tanbircdq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've not operated any other accounts during my previous block or since and as far as I'm aware I've not been editing while logged out either. Tanbircdq (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm declining this purely on the copyright problems. You simply can not get away with "I've read through WP:COPYVIO and WP:PARAPHRASE in detail and made myself familiar with the rules and guidelines" now, not after you have been ignoring copyright warnings stretching back more than a year! Your contempt for Wikipedia's copyright policy and for copyright law could cause legal problems for Wikipedia, in addition to wasting significant volunteer time in cleaning up your violations.

I'll just add that at Mahi Muqit, your original version was deleted in July 2017 as a copyright violation, yet you recreated it in August 2017 with exactly the same content. There's no way you did not know it was a copyright violation when you did that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:58, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Nina Ruth Davis Salaman[edit]

A tag has been placed on Nina Ruth Davis Salaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/salaman-nina-ruth-davis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also found copyright violations in Pilgrim State (book), Tulip Siddiq, Jackie Walker (activist), BAME Labour. I have nominated International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism for deletion as a copyright violation, because the source webpage is released under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 UK) license, which is not a compatible license. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Draper (filmmaker)[edit]

The article Daniel Draper (filmmaker) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Likewise, the article on his film Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists. – Fayenatic London 14:48, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted Daniel Draper (filmmaker) for copyright violations. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, for the same reason. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:50, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art/38580/Still+Ragged+++film+celebrates+100+years+of+a+working+class+classic https://www.blazingminds.co.uk/new-film-labour-politician-dennis-skinner/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Still Ragged: 100 Years of The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And Daniel Draper (filmmaker) too. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:48, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice[edit]

Hello, Tanbircdq. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. If nothing else, this means that you will no longer be notified if other articles are found where you seem to have added copyright material. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:26, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sarah Begum[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sarah Begum, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.specialistspeakers.com/?p=8014. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miratul Muqit[edit]

A tag has been placed on Miratul Muqit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ukpdc/groups/protein-phosphorylation-group/miratul-muqit. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Still Ragged.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Still Ragged.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Pilgrim State (book)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Pilgrim State (book), Tanbircdq!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: Unfortunately, it lifted content almost verbatim from its sources, so I have deleted it for copyright violations. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pilgrim State (book)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Pilgrim State (book) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be an almost direct copy from several of its sources. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:05, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rez Kabir for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rez Kabir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rez Kabir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Editor General of Wiki (talk) 09:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Bishaash episodes[edit]

A tag has been placed on List of Bishaash episodes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1542501/episodes. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Esther Salaman (singer)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Esther Salaman (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.theguardian.com/news/2005/oct/26/guardianobituaries.artsobituaries1 – please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Esther Salaman (writer)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Esther Salaman (writer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituaryesther-salaman-1583261.html – please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of What It Feels Like To Be Me[edit]

A tag has been placed on What It Feels Like To Be Me requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hgs.org.uk/suburbnews/sn104/sn-7.pdf – please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Esther Salaman[edit]

A tag has been placed on Esther Salaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Lynching[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Lynching requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/the-london-play-framing-jews-as-the-revamped-kkk-1.5455655 – please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shoebox (musical)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Shoebox (musical) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.liverpoolsoundandvision.co.uk/2013/05/11/the-bluecoat-to-showcase-new-songs-from-the-musical-the-shoebox-on-june-6th/ – please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Battle of Brick Lane 1978[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Battle of Brick Lane 1978 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20180424104431/http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/heritage/author-azas-konor-relives-the-battle-of-brick-lane-40-years-after-altab-ali-s-murder-1-5488723 – please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Amazon Souls.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amazon Souls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:What It Feels Like To Be Me.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:What It Feels Like To Be Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Socialist Society[edit]

A tag has been placed on Black Socialist Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tmponline.org/wp-content/071223-bame-labour-report.pdf (please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Labour Party Black Sections[edit]

A tag has been placed on Labour Party Black Sections requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/06/race.labour (please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:09, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Corbyn Comic Book[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Corbyn Comic Book requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2017/aug/21/jeremy-corbyn-comic-book-hero (please see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Tanbircdq). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Corbyn Comic Book.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Corbyn Comic Book.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wahhabism - A Critical Essay.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wahhabism - A Critical Essay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammed Ali (artist)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mohammed Ali (artist), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2007-04-16/news/0704150358_1_mural-islamic-circle-mosque. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Grindley[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mike Grindley, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.independent.co.uk/news/sweet-revenge-for-man-who-defied-union-ban-at-gchq-1261367.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BAME Labour[edit]

A tag has been placed on BAME Labour, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2017/08/battle-bame-labour-will-keith-vaz-lose-his-national-executive-committee. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Lynching.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Lynching.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheraz Yousaf for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheraz Yousaf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheraz Yousaf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:02, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enamul Hoque for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enamul Hoque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enamul Hoque (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rukia Begum for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rukia Begum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rukia Begum (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sugapuff for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sugapuff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugapuff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shahena Ali for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahena Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahena Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Salam Jones for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salam Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salam Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Days of Our Wives for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Days of Our Wives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Days of Our Wives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:53, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naga MC for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naga MC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naga MC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 14:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shawkat Hashmi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shawkat Hashmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawkat Hashmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 10:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lovedesh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lovedesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovedesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 11:00, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yasmin Choudhury for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yasmin Choudhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasmin Choudhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 11:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anwarul Hoque for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anwarul Hoque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anwarul Hoque until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 11:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fahimul Anam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fahimul Anam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahimul Anam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 11:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Selina Begum Ali for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Selina Begum Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selina Begum Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 11:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of China Chowdhury for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article China Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Chowdhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:04, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hamja Ahsan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamja Ahsan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamja Ahsan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saima Chowdhury for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saima Chowdhury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saima Chowdhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rainbow Collective for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rainbow Collective is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Collective until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Not Ok Here, Not Ok Anywhere for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Not Ok Here, Not Ok Anywhere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not Ok Here, Not Ok Anywhere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Voices from the Camps for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voices from the Camps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voices from the Camps until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bafana for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bafana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bafana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AmaZulu: The Children of Heaven for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AmaZulu: The Children of Heaven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AmaZulu: The Children of Heaven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tariq Chow for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tariq Chow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Chow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 12:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Elephant in the Room (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Elephant in the Room (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Elephant in the Room (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Faith in London for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faith in London is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith in London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Murad Ahmed for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murad Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murad Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mahmudul Hasan (imam) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahmudul Hasan (imam) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmudul Hasan (imam) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sonia Yasmin Ali for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonia Yasmin Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Yasmin Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?[edit]

I have to ask: do you have any sort of conflict of interest with the articles you've added to Wikipedia. The reason I'm asking this is that you've made some articles that are extremely promotional, to the point where it looks very, very likely that there is some undisclosed paid editing going on as part of a marketing job. It's possible that there isn't, but the articles' tones are in keeping with ones that were created by marketing or freelancers that were hired to create articles. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:ReaderofthePack. Tanbircdq is indefinately banned from editing and may be unable to answer any questions. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vif12vf/Tiberius! They're not blocked from editing their own talk page, so they should be able to reply if they chose to. My concern here is that if there was some undisclosed paid editing going on, this needs to be disclosed if the editor wants to be unblocked. There's just too many promotional tones to the articles for my comfort. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Acctually i think he got blocked from editing his own talk-page as well. At least he has not answered inquiries from anyone for quite a while. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't have a talk page block - he just hasn't responded to anything since the 12th. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Days Of Our Wives.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Days Of Our Wives.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Faith in London.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Faith in London.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Voices from the Camps.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Voices from the Camps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wajid Akhtar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wajid Akhtar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wajid Akhtar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 15:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iqra Promotions for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iqra Promotions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqra Promotions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Labbayk for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Labbayk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labbayk (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 15:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BritBangla for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BritBangla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BritBangla (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 16:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taryn Khanam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taryn Khanam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taryn Khanam (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abu Sayed Ansary for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abu Sayed Ansary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Sayed Ansary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 10:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmed Babikir for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Babikir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Babikir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 11:08, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of One Night in Turin (Original Motion Picture Score) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Night in Turin (Original Motion Picture Score) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Night in Turin (Original Motion Picture Score) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 11:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovedesh logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lovedesh logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Forced Marriage (book) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forced Marriage (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forced Marriage (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 07:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of London Bangla Press Club for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Bangla Press Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Bangla Press Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 07:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toffael Rashid for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toffael Rashid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toffael Rashid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 07:52, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Elephant in the Room poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Elephant in the Room poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Allah Made Me Funny - Live HMV Apollo poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allah Made Me Funny - Live HMV Apollo poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Allah Made Me Funny DVD cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allah Made Me Funny DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:London Tradition logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:London Tradition logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Taryn Khanam[edit]

A tag has been placed on Taryn Khanam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BritBangla[edit]

A tag has been placed on BritBangla, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 22:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruje Yasmin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruje Yasmin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruje Yasmin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 06:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Halima Begum for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Halima Begum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halima Begum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 06:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BritBangla logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BritBangla logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Forced Marriage.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forced Marriage.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:London Bangla Press Club.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:London Bangla Press Club.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iqra Promotions logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iqra Promotions logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ehsaan and Friends - O' My Lord.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ehsaan and Friends - O' My Lord.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Labbayk - Rhymes of Praise.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Labbayk - Rhymes of Praise.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Labbayk - The Greatest Gift.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Labbayk - The Greatest Gift.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kamal Uddin - Illallah.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kamal Uddin - Illallah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kamal Uddin - In The Name Of Allah.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kamal Uddin - In The Name Of Allah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sharmeena Begum for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharmeena Begum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharmeena Begum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Openlydialectic (talk) 21:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lasan logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lasan logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rainbow Collective logo.jpeg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rainbow Collective logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rohema Miah for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohema Miah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohema Miah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rainbow Collective has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Rainbow Collective, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 07:05, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of British Bangladesh Chamber of Women Entrepreneurs for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British Bangladesh Chamber of Women Entrepreneurs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Bangladesh Chamber of Women Entrepreneurs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:British Bangladesh Chamber Of Women Entrepreneurs.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:British Bangladesh Chamber Of Women Entrepreneurs.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shireen Jawad - Mathwali.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shireen Jawad - Mathwali.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mizan the Poet for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mizan the Poet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizan the Poet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruqsana Begum for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruqsana Begum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruqsana Begum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abul Taher[edit]

The article Abul Taher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trumpkinius (talk) 16:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hi,

Please can you contact me at pixomarket@gmail.com

I have a few questions.

Kind regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.174.114.156 (talk) 12:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baghdad Holiday[edit]

The article Baghdad Holiday has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 10:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Baghdad Holiday.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baghdad Holiday.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Racist Murder of Altab Ali: A Bengali East End Garment Worker Murdered in 1978" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Racist Murder of Altab Ali: A Bengali East End Garment Worker Murdered in 1978. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 26#Racist Murder of Altab Ali: A Bengali East End Garment Worker Murdered in 1978 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The 500 Most Influential Muslims 2009.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The 500 Most Influential Muslims 2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bilal (British singer) EPs[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bilal (British singer) EPs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bilal - About Us.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bilal - About Us.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Salique songs[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Salique songs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jewish Voice for Labour.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jewish Voice for Labour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Leaders of People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets councillors has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets councillors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 11:30, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rowshanara Moni albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rowshanara Moni albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group councillors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 08:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tower Hamlets First councillors has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Tower Hamlets First councillors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Leaders of Tower Hamlets First has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bondegezou (talk) 08:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets politicians[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets politicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:People's Alliance of Tower Hamlets indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group politicians[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Tower Hamlets Independent Group politicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:14, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SunniPath - An Online Islamic Educational Institute.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SunniPath - An Online Islamic Educational Institute.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bangladeshi-Canadian films[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi-Canadian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aspire (political party) has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Aspire (political party) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 03:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tower Hamlets First has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Tower Hamlets First has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 03:39, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:My Bollywood Wedding.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My Bollywood Wedding.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bangladeshi film singers has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Bangladeshi film singers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bangladeshi cricket tours of Scotland[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi cricket tours of Scotland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ahmad Hussain albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ahmad Hussain albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iqra Promotions albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Iqra Promotions albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iqra Promotions artists[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Iqra Promotions artists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 18:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bangladeshi film remakes has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Bangladeshi film remakes has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 19:04, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SM-Logo-2008.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SM-Logo-2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Paralympic Games Great Britain wheelchair rugby squad templates[edit]

A number of "Paralympic Games Great Britain wheelchair rugby squad templates" templates, at least one of which you created, have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 26#Paralympic Games Great Britain wheelchair rugby squad templates. Nigej (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Remakes of Bangladeshi films[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Remakes of Bangladeshi films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The A-Z Guide To Arranged Marriage.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The A-Z Guide To Arranged Marriage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2Point9 Records albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2Point9 Records albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jernade Miah albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Jernade Miah albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Saudi Arabian emigrants to Oman[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Saudi Arabian emigrants to Oman indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Saudi Arabian people of Bangladeshi descent[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Saudi Arabian people of Bangladeshi descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bengali-language newspapers published in the United States has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Bengali-language newspapers published in the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 20:30, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bengali-language newspapers published in Pakistan has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Bengali-language newspapers published in Pakistan has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bengali-language newspapers published in the United Kingdom has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:Bengali-language newspapers published in the United Kingdom has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Iqra Promotions[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Iqra Promotions indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:White Teeth (soundtrack).jpg[edit]

The file File:White Teeth (soundtrack).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tharik Hussain for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tharik Hussain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tharik Hussain (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bangladeshi fantasy films[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi fantasy films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:06, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bangladeshi fantasy[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bangladeshi fantasy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Alumni of Newham Sixth Form College[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Alumni of Newham Sixth Form College indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Devil's Thumbprint for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Devil's Thumbprint is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Devil's Thumbprint until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 00:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Delwar Hussain for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delwar Hussain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delwar Hussain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Books by Ahsan Akbar[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Books by Ahsan Akbar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 07:21, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Devil's Thumbprint.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Devil's Thumbprint.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farzana Dua Elahe for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farzana Dua Elahe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farzana Dua Elahe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Worldbruce (talk) 11:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mehvashaa[edit]

The article Mehvashaa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mehvashaa.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mehvashaa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saris And The City.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saris And The City.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Animals of Farthing Wood (disambiguation) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Animals of Farthing Wood (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Animals of Farthing Wood (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MirrorPlanet (talk) 12:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British Asian people has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:British Asian people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Jewish religious violence" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Jewish religious violence has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 15 § Jewish religious violence until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 20:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Allah Made Me Funny (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Allah Made Me Funny (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 10:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 6 § Category:Alumni by university or college in the United Kingdom[edit]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 6 § Category:Alumni by university or college in the United Kingdom on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 17:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Welsh people of Arab descent[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Welsh people of Arab descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]