User talk:Xeyal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. I understand that I have been blocked for violating Wikipedia rules. I promise this will never happen again. I need to get out of the block to be more active. I ask you to open the block and monitor my activities. — Xeyal ^talk 20:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for abusing multiple accounts. You need to address this directly in order for an appeal to be considered.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. I understand that I have been blocked for using multiple accounts. I promise this will not happen again. I need to get out of the block to be more active. I ask you to open the block and monitor my activities. — Xeyal ^(talk) 20:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the concern, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xeyal/Archive, that you are related to the Wikiazeus socks. Nor does it address the problems with your edits. Yamla (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. I do not understand why the user is not unblocked if he understands the mistake and promises not to do it again? or mistakes are not forgiven here? It would be better if you do the block term for a lifetime, not a lifetime. I understand my mistake. I have been blocked for 5 months. I think it is important for me to leave the block to make new contributions. In addition, I suggest that you monitor my activities. — Xeyal ^(talk) 08:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you need to do is a) disclose all accounts you created, regardless of whether you ever edited with them or not, and then tell us which one will be your account from now on. If you can do that, this conversation has a chance of continuing. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I ask you to reconsider the last discussions and remove me from the block. — Xeyal ^(talk) 20:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock last time[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Cullen328, ‪ST47 I promise you one last time that I will make more useful contributions from now on and will not use a doll account. While I'm on the block, there are delays in my work and I can't make useful contributions. Please take this into account. I mentioned this in more detail in my previous discussions. I want you to give me one last chance. I think it is not difficult to give the user a chance. It's been 7 months since I was blocked and I promise I won't break the rules again as a big punishment. I want you to give me one last chance. I'm really sorry. — Xeyal ^(talk) 15:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

After looking at the sock puppetry report, I have to agree that your articles are promotional. I think you need to tell us what you're going to do differently if you're unblocked. Also, please read the bolded text: you're not supposed to remove declined unblock requests. Maybe we should change that text to be red. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock (WP:AGF)[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello dear Admins. I would like to inform you that my block has not been opened yet. When my blog is opened, I really want to assure you that such a violation will never happen again. — Xeyal ^(talk) 12:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query Me!} 05:08, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

— Xeyal ^(talk) 12:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Dear Admins. My block period has been going on for more than 1 year, please re-read the statements I mentioned above and help me open my block. I promise not to break the rules again. Thanks. — Xeyal ^(talk) 10:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your previous requests were declined as insufficient. Making a new request and requesting the reviewer look at the previous requests which you already know are insufficient is deliberately abusive. You will likely lose access to your talk page if you continue making abusive unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 10:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blanking[edit]

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xeyal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi ST47, As you may recall, I was banned for abusing multiple accounts, and I want to express my sincere regret for my past behavior. I recognize that my actions were wrong and hurtful to the Wikipedia community, and I want to search for an opportunity to provide good work to the platform. Though I first wanted to inquire to you first. — Xeyal ^(talk) 15:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not improve on your prior requests. Since this seems to be a waste of time for everyone, I am declining your request and removing talk page access. When you are able to confront the reasons for the block and tell us what will be different, you may use WP:UTRS for further appeals. 331dot (talk) 17:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #74603[edit]

is closed. It would be best for user to take a hiatus from English language Wikipedia for at least six months while editing constructively elsewhere. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]