Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of India women Twenty20 International cricketers/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of India women Twenty20 International cricketers[edit]

List of India women Twenty20 International cricketers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): —Vensatry (talk) 18:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Back to FLC after a hiatus. This one is based upon the existing FLs. Look forward to comments and suggestions —Vensatry (talk) 18:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Harrias talk
  • First paragraph: "As of August 2017, India has played 73 WT20Is...", second paragraph: "As of 2017, India has played a total of 54 matches..." – No need for the repetition, particularly as they give different figures! Get rid of one of these, and make sure whichever you keep has the right figure.
  • In the table, I would flip the header rows so that 'Batting', 'Bowling' and 'Fielding' are above the other headings. Historically, we had to do it this way for the sorting to work, but it would look better with those on the top row.
  • Make the dashes in the Bowling average and Economy columns sort the other way around - the bowling average of 8.00 should appear at the top, not after a load of dashes. Similarly with the economy of 2.66.
  • Referencing all looks good, and checks on the prosaic sources show no copyvio or close para-phrasing. All the link are live.
  • All images appear to be free with appropriate licenses, and have alt text.

Nice work; not much to work on here. Any chance you could take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/England cricket team Test results (1920–39)/archive3? Harrias talk 11:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrias: Thanks for the comments. Hopefully, I've fixed all. Quite a task for a women-hating editor. :) Btw, I haven't forgotten your list - give me a day or two. —Vensatry (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, nice work. Can be a pain keeping these up to date though! Harrias talk 13:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Ianblair23 (talk) 10:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
:Hi Vensatry, please find my comments below:
  • Lead:
  • and is played under the rules of Twenty20 cricket fix link to Twenty20
  • As of September 2017 add {{As of}}
  • It was among the semifinalists of the 2009 change "it" to "the team" or "India"
  • when it was bowled out for 62 runs again, change "it"
  • Images
  • Jhulan Goswami has been the leading wicket-taker India in the format. "in the format" is used in two captions in a row. Change to WT20Is.
  • Key
  • Table:
  • Row 9 – fix sort for Nooshin Al Khadeer
  • Rows 1 and 3 – fix sort of highest score Goswami's 37* came of 26 balls [2] while Chopra's came off 52 [3]
  • Rows 24 and 34 – fix sort of highest score Nagarajan's 15 came of 14 balls [4] while Bisht's came off 15 [5]
  • Rows 13, 4 and 43 – fix sort of highest scores
  • Please check the highest score sort for the 3's, 2's and 1's as well
  • Rows 16 and 19 – fix sort for 50's Raut's 4 came from fewer innings.
  • Please check the sort for the remaining 50's
  • Sorting by wickets needs to be fixed as well, secondary sort by matches
  • Sorting by BBI needs to be fixed as well, secondary sort by overs bowled
  • Secondary sort can be done only based on a statistic that's available in the table. Overs pertain to individual matches. —Vensatry (talk) 08:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorting by catches needs to be fixed as well, secondary sort by matches played
  • Stumpings – should those players who have never kept wicket have dashes rather than zeros?
Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 11:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ianblair23: Thanks for the comments. As for secondary sort, the feature is already built in. All that you have to do is, first sort by matches (or whichever column(s) is/are applicable) and then by the intended column. —Vensatry (talk) 08:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Harrias and Ianblair23: Any update yet? —Vensatry (talk) 06:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Support –

  • Mithali Raj photo: The caption could use "the" before "most occasions".
  • Jhulan Goswami photo: This caption needs "for" before "India in the format". Giants2008 (Talk) 20:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 20:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_India_women_Twenty20_International_cricketers/archive1&oldid=1138482629"