Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of five-wicket hauls in women's Twenty20 International cricket/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of five-wicket hauls in women's Twenty20 International cricket[edit]

List of five-wicket hauls in women's Twenty20 International cricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Ianblair23 (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the newest form of the centuries old game, this feat has only been achieved 11 times by 10 female cricketers. A newly created article, this will soon appear on the main page as a DYK. With only eight out of current 189 cricket featured lists on the women's game, I believe that this will be a great addition to that. I await your feedback on this nomination. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from —Vensatry (talk) 11:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Vensatry
  • Mention the name of the player in alt text
Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 9 runs -> nine runs
Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'innings' is linked twice in the lead
Done unlinked second occurance – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The first five-wicket haul was taken by New Zealand ..." - Be more specific about the format
Done good pick up, added the format to the sentence – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The most recent haul was taken by Suné Luus of South Africa against Ireland during the 2016 ICC Women's World Twenty20 in Chennai." - You mean a five wicket haul? Also, mention the ground name to maintain consistency.
Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Julie Hunter of Australia took the least economical five-wicket haul, bowling with an economy rate of 6.60." - Date would be helpful
Done added date – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Month and year would suffice. (it also helps maintain consistency). —Vensatry (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Modified as suggested – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Players from six of the teams that hold Twenty20 International status have taken five-wicket hauls, with Bangladesh, Ireland, Pakistan and Sri Lanka the only teams for which a bowler has not achieved the milestone." - This needs to be rephrased for grammar and clarity.
Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a way to club this one and the 'Netherlands' bit? —Vensatry (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have had another crack at it. Let me know what you think. – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The last line (about four-fers) seems a bit irrelevant.
I have seen this added on other five-wicket haul lists. I think it give the reader some context on many times players have just missed out on achieving the milestone. But happy to remove it if you insist. – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, no issues —Vensatry (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Adding country names (in the 'Ground' col.) would be helpful to the readers.
Done added date – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Include a tertiary sort for the 'Wkts'. column based on economy rate.
Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

—Vensatry (talk) 12:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: Thank you very much for the review. I believe that all of your comments have now been addressed. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, one other question. In which order should be batters be listed – the order in which they appeared on the scorecard or the order in which they were dismissed? I have done the former but I could not find anywhere what the preference is. It should be documented in the style guide. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I guess there's no clearcut rule. But, we normally follow the latter. —Vensatry (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This one is still unanswered. —Vensatry (talk) 04:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Vensatry: Sorry about that. I have now listed the batters in the order in which they were dismissed. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 02:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comments along with source review (random spotchecks included)

  • "Players from six of the 10 teams that hold Twenty20 International status" - 10 -> ten as they are comparable figures.
Done – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected links in both the body and the key – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • In ref #2, why the page no. is linked to a url?
Updated ref, corrected page number and the link to the relevant page within the pdf document now works – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add page no(s). for ref #3.
Updated ref and added the page number – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref #4 - Material faithful to the source
  • Ref #5 - I don't think the 'New Zealand defeated England by nine runs' bit is covered in the source.
Added additional source to support claim – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref #12 - Material faithful to the source
  • Ref #14 - Material faithful to the source

—Vensatry (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Vensatry: Additional comments have been addressed. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support (source review included), nice work on the list. —Vensatry (talk) 11:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic! Thank you so for the review Vensatry – Ianblair23 (talk) 11:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "the best bowling figures in an innings by a player in the international format" should that be best by a woman? Just a question as I'm not sure what the best men's T20I figures are...
  • Corrected. By the way Amy Satterthwaite's 6/17 has only been bettered by one male player, Sri Lanka's Ajantha Mendis who took 6/16 in 2011 and 6/8 in 2012. Which means that Satterthwaite's performance was the best overall from 2007 to 2011. – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "aged just 17" remove "just".
  • " from a total of 380 matches,[18] a total of " "a total of...a total of"... at the least, the second is unnecessary.
  • Comma after Sri Lanka and comma after England needed.

That's all. Minor stuff. A good list. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks very much for the review TRM. I have addressed the above comments. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 00:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much TRM! – Ianblair23 (talk) 10:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_five-wicket_hauls_in_women%27s_Twenty20_International_cricket/archive1&oldid=1138486435"