Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pink lady and cross section.jpg

Reason: High quality technically and excellent EV. I'm interested in what people think about adding the extra view of the top of the apple to the composition?
Articles this image appears in: Cripps Pink
Creator: Fir0002

Support as nominator --Fir0002 10:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done, as usual. Please see my comments on the nature of all of these studio shots in the Red Delicious nom.--HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 18:19, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Durova^Charge! 01:11, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avala (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Spikebrennan (talk) 20:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the extra view at the top is fine. Good job. Spencer^T♦^C 02:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question how does the average person know just from the picture that this is a Pink Lady, and not some other pink-red-green apple such as a Braeburn? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How does the average person know how to distinguish between a Pink Lady and a Braeburn in the first place? If there's an obvious distinguishing feature, then of course that should be illustrated in the photo, but otherwise, I think photos should be seen as complements to the text, not to be taken wholly on their own. After all, it's hard to tell who the subject of a portrait is if you don't already know how the subject looks, but in context of an article, they serves as good illustrations on how the person looks. Thegreenj 15:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Pink lady and cross section.jpg MER-C 07:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]