Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Addition log/2018

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alexandra Stan studio albums (1st supplementary nomination)[edit]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Alexandra Stan studio albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

  1. Mami (album)

Hi there! I am nominating Mami, Stan latest studio album, to be part of this topic, as it was recently passed to GA. Many thanks! Cartoon network freak (talk) 04:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel Cinematic Universe films (3rd supplementary nomination)[edit]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Marvel Cinematic Universe films for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

  1. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
  2. Spider-Man: Homecoming
  3. Thor: Ragnarok

The last of the 2017 MCU films, Thor: Ragnarok, has just become a GA. The previous 2 2017 film (Vol. 2 and Homecoming) were not previously nominated for the topic, though they have already become GAs. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Looks good. - Brojam (talk) 02:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Amazing work to all the editors involved. —IB [ Poke ] 10:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per above comments. Nice that the community managed to get this done in time for the release of Avengers: Infinity War, and that anyone looking for information about the previous films has a quality article to read. I know that there is WP:NORUSH but it still put a smile on my fact to know that this has happened. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - good work. Also for some reason, Doctor Strange shows up as a DAB on my page, even though I purged it. Might be a problem on my end... Kees08 (Talk) 17:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Nope, you're right. The article has since moved to a more specific disambiguation. I've fixed it in this nom. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Looks good to me. Damian Vo (talk) 03:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Actually came here to do this, since I was surprised they hadn't been added already. Sock (tock talk) 22:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Looks good to me too. Looks like it will be a lot of work keeping it up to date; there have been two movies since. You could consider dividing into phases per the list article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Topic looks fine, but consider working on "Box office records set by MCU films" and perhaps expand the accolades list to one for the entire MCU. I actually think you should remove the current accolades list, since a few such lists could be created for some of the other movies. Nergaal (talk) 20:40, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Favre1fan93: It all looks good, but Black Panther (film) has only 12 days left to be nominated for at least GA status. (That's one month after the physical home media release.) Armbrust The Homunculus 07:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Armbrust: Yes I am aware, thanks. I was hoping this additional topic nom would have closed before needing to nominate Black Panther. The page will be nominated in time, and should it get reviewed and passed before this closes, I will include that article in this nom. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closed with consensus to add Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, Spider-Man: Homecoming, and Thor: Ragnarok to the topic. - GamerPro64 15:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Main Fire Emblem series (1st supplementary nomination)[edit]

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Main Fire Emblem series for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

  1. Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon
  2. Fire Emblem: New Mystery of the Emblem
  3. Fire Emblem Echoes: Shadows of Valentia

Thanks to User:ProtoDrake's fine work, all of the Fire Emblem series games, excluding spin-offs, are GA! Topic should be updated to cover them all. (Per the topic talk page, it was a little shaky that these three were excluded at all before, but that's irrelevant now; the topic definition can be drawn a little wider.) I think it'd be fine to just move the template name to "Fire Emblem series" as well, or even "Fire Emblem games". Maybe some day the spinoffs in TMS (already a GA!), Warriors, and Heroes will all be GA as well... SnowFire (talk) 00:25, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, though it might make sense to put the 3 remakes indented underneath the lines for the original games instead of just listed out like the rest, to make it clear that they're connected. --PresN 21:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • If everyone else wants to do this, I'll change it. That said, commented about this on the talk page already, but I personally don't even see the remake connection as that significant. FE12 is much closer to FE13 in gameplay, graphics, style, influence, dev team, etc. than it is to FE3, so chronological order is better. My two cents, anyway. SnowFire (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]