Wikipedia:WikiProject Business

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcuts:
WP:BUSNS
WP:BUSINESS
Points of interest related to Business on Wikipedia
Portal – Category – WikiProject – Stubs – Deletions – Cleanup


This WikiProject provides guidelines on topics related to Business and provides a space where users can collaborate to improve related articles. Sister projects include WikiProject Economics, WikiProject Investment, and WikiProject Finance.

WikiProject Business
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 6 4 7 1 19
Featured list FL 4 1 5
A-Class article A 6 7 10 1 24
Good article GA 3 6 2 4 14 29
B 55 82 143 117 27 424
C 5 5 13 9 14 46
Start 38 97 263 419 325 1142
Stub 12 55 216 1092 11501 12876
List 5 4 14 23
Assessed 120 258 656 1657 11897 14588
Unassessed 3 6 4 4 1378 1395
Total 123 264 660 1661 13275 15983


Contents

[edit] Participants

For more information, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Business.

Feel free to add yourself here, if you are interested in helping out with the project in any capacity.

The preferred method of adding yourself to this project is one of the following:

This user is a member of the Business WikiProject.


  • If you do not like user boxes, adding [[Category:WikiProject Business participants|{{subst:PAGENAME}}]] anywhere on your user page will also add you to this category, but without the user box.


If none of this makes sense, just add your name below:

  1. Chicocvenancio (talk · contribs)
  2. Chelman (talk · contribs)
  3. Christofurio (talk · contribs)
  4. Dupz (talk · contribs)
  5. Fenice (talk · contribs)
  6. ian3055 (talk · contribs)
  7. Jarl Friis (talk · contribs)
  8. JBKramer (talk · contribs)
  9. JMcDermott (talk · contribs)
  10. John Quiggin (talk · contribs)
  11. Karimarie (talk · contribs)
  12. King of Anonymity (talk · contribs)
  13. MegamanZero (talk · contribs)
  14. Nishkid64 (talk · contribs)
  15. Parker007 (talk · contribs)
  16. Peripatetic (talk · contribs)
  17. Punanimal (talk · contribs)
  18. Saksham (talk · contribs)
  19. Shawnc (talk · contribs)
  20. SimonP (talk · contribs)
  21. smmurphy (talk · contribs)
  22. Spenceb (talk · contribs)
  23. Tomeasy (talk · contribs)
  24. The Land (talk · contribs)
  25. Ukrained (talk · contribs)
  26. Wackymacs (talk · contribs)
  27. Yaanch (talk · contribs)
  28. Zen. (talk · contribs)
  29. Karina.l.k (talk · contribs)
  30. Cbarom (talk · contribs)
  31. Diego.buonvino (talk · contribs)
  32. Gogal (talk · contribs)
  33. Lordthees (talk · contribs)
  34. Rahulkhare (talk · contribs)
  35. XinLee (talk · contribs)
  36. Brett epic (talk · contribs)
  37. J (talk · contribs)
  38. m.aitlahcen (talk · contribs)
  39. Pocopocopocopoco
  40. Nshuks7 (talk · contribs)
  41. Schmo24 (talk · contribs)
  42. Ecoleetage (talk · contribs)
  43. FoxLad (talk · contribs)
  44. Pengutron (talk · contribs)
  45. Colliff
  46. Yorker
  47. U$V$Sci

[edit] Assesment Task Force

[edit] How to Assess an Article

Assessing an article is easy! Before you begin, look at the Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team Assessment Scale and Examples. This explains the rating system and gives examples of correctly rated articles.

  1. Go to the category by clicking on Unassessed in the assessment box at the top of this page. You will see a list of articles in need of assessment.
  2. Click on an article link - this should take you to the talk page
  3. Click on the "Article" tab - look at the article and make an assessment
  4. Click on the "Discussion" tab - this should return you to the talk page
  5. Click the "Edit this Page" tab. You will see {{WikiProject Business| class= | importance= }} at the top of the page.
  6. Fill in the tag's attributes
    1. Fill in class= using one of these values: Stub, Start, B, GA, A, FA. (Before assessing, please note the following definitions:)
    2. Fill in importance= using one of these values: Top, High, Mid, Low.
  7. You're done! (unless you want to go back to Unassessed and do another assessment) -- we hope you will!

Note: You can also put the tag {{Business| class= | importance= }} on any business or economics article you come across that hasn't yet been associated with this project. This will add it to the list of unassessed topics.

[edit] Assessment Standards

[edit] Content Standards

For content area standards, see Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information

[edit] FA Criteria

A featured article exemplifies our very best work and features professional standards of writing and presentation. In addition to meeting the requirements for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes:

  1. It is well written, comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and stable.
    • (a) "Well written" means that the prose is compelling, even brilliant.
    • (b) "Comprehensive" means that the article does not neglect major facts and details.
    • (c) "Factually accurate" means that claims are attributable to reliable sources and accurately present the related body of published knowledge. Claims are supported with specific evidence and external citations; this involves the provision of a "References" section in which sources are set out, complemented by inline citations for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged. See the Verifiability policy for information on when and how extensively references are provided, and citing sources for suggestions on formatting references; for articles with footnotes or endnotes, the meta:cite format is recommended.
    • (d) "Neutral" means that the article presents views fairly and without bias (see neutral point of view); however, articles need not give minority views equal coverage (see undue weight).
    • (e) "Stable" means that the article is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and that its content does not change significantly from day to day; vandalism reverts and improvements based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply.
  2. It complies with the standards set out in the manual of style and relevant WikiProjects, including:
    • (a) a concise lead section that summarizes the entire topic and prepares the reader for the higher level of detail in the subsequent sections;
    • (b) a proper system of hierarchical headings; and
    • (c) a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents (see section help).
  3. It should have images if they are appropriate to the subject, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. If non-free content images are used, they must meet the criteria for fair use images and be labeled accordingly.
  4. It is of appropriate length, staying focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

[edit] Participants (assessment division)

Participants add your name below:

  1. akronpow
  2. Crocodile Punter
  3. Ukrained
  4. Trade2tradewell
  5. Mike Searson
  6. HyDeckar
  7. Egfrank
  8. Mtmelendez
  9. Majoreditor
  10. The Random Editor
  11. davejblair
  12. Pafcool2
  13. Sohail Gogal
  14. tomdebevoise
  15. Pearrari
  16. Susanlesch
  17. Whit3hawk
  18. Protonk
  19. Colliff
  20. Yorker
  21. Hazen Fley
  22. UI2008
  23. Zithan
  24. User:U$V$Sci

[edit] Related projects or activities

[edit] Industry specific

[edit] External links

[edit] Tasks
WikiProject: Business
Here are some business and economics related tasks you can do:
view • edit • discuss • history • watch

To add this to your user page, insert {{Bizetasks}}.


[edit] List of missing articles

Update the list of missing articles, create an article on this list, or bookmark it.

[edit] Templates

[edit] Banner

For placement at the top of the talk page of any Business and Economics-related article use {{Business}} which results in the following banner:

WikiProject Business
Business portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
??? This page has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Infoboxes

[edit] Navigational templates

[edit] Short articles

Insert stub templates for very short articles.

[edit] Browsing articles

[edit] Lists of topics

General
People
Other


[edit] Other schemes

[edit] Pages needing attention

This Wikipedia page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
Either the page is no longer relevant, or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you should seek broader input via a forum such as the proposals page of the village pump.

[edit] Business

— Do not add text below this point —