Wikipedia:Peer review/Kiki's Delivery Service/archive2
Kiki's Delivery Service[edit]
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it should become a good article again and I would like to know what else needs to be done to achieve that goal.
Thanks, CyberGhostface (talk) 14:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Good job! This is a good film and deserves a nice looking article like this! Some quick suggestions.
In the plot section maybe it's not best to say "obviously inspired" even if it is, because that's kind of a odd way to put it. It sounds too unfactual. If you want to include it, perhaps it's best to state that strongly resembles it.
In the infobox, the flags should be gone as WP:FilmRelease suggests against it. I'll change them myself!
Try to put ciations that come around commas after the comma to increase readability.
The award section in release is a bit list-y. Perhaps it could be in a chart or expanded? These awards don't suggest what year they were given out or what's the notability of them.
The musical and differences form the book section need citations but are also pretty well integrated otherwise.
Good job overall! Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:26, 26 August 2008 (UTC)