Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Arrest and assassination of Ngo Dinh Diem

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Arrest and assassination of Ngô Đình Diệm[edit]

This article covers the arrest and assassination of Ngo Dinh Diem, teh first president of the Republic of Vietnam at the end of a coup. Hopefully, I will manage to get this to FA but Nov 2, the date when he was killed. Let the suggestions begin! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 09:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Good stuff. I like the detail and the amount of ground you've covered. Looks like a pretty even-handed treatment of a fairly controversial subject as well. Good job on that. The only suggestions I have relate to the look of the article. Are there any more pictures available? Right now, it's pretty grey, and a few pictures or illustrations might help to break up the sections. JKBrooks85 14:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~(edit conf) Why are words bolded in the lead? Woodym555 14:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those appear to be the key words in the title of the article. JKBrooks85 17:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

after a successful coup isn't in the title, and i don't think it serves much purpose anyway does it? When i first look at is it seems like placing emphasis randomly. Wikipedia:Lead section#Bold title says : (Title should be mentioned naturally as soon as possible.) If the topic of an article has no name, and the title is simply descriptive—like Electrical characteristics of a dynamic loudspeaker—the title does not need to appear verbatim in the main text; if it does, it is not in boldface: I think this clause applies here. Woodym555 18:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the bold for the reasons stated above. I also used the 24hour clock as per WP:MOSNUM. I now Support Woodym555 21:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The article looks good. The only thing I am not sure about is as Woodym the bold links. Kyriakos 23:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.