Coherence condition
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
In mathematics, and particularly category theory, a coherence condition is a collection of conditions requiring that various compositions of elementary morphisms are equal. Typically the elementary morphisms are part of the data of the category. A coherence theorem states that, in order to be assured that all these equalities hold, it suffices to check a small number of identities.
An illustrative example: a monoidal category
[edit]Part of the data of a monoidal category is a chosen morphism , called the associator:
for each triple of objects in the category. Using compositions of these , one can construct a morphism
Actually, there are many ways to construct such a morphism as a composition of various . One coherence condition that is typically imposed is that these compositions are all equal.
Typically one proves a coherence condition using a coherence theorem, which states that one only needs to check a few equalities of compositions in order to show that the rest also hold. In the above example, one only needs to check that, for all quadruples of objects , the following diagram commutes.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/Monoidal_category_pentagon.svg/640px-Monoidal_category_pentagon.svg.png)
Any pair of morphisms from to constructed as compositions of various are equal.
Further examples
[edit]Two simple examples that illustrate the definition are as follows. Both are directly from the definition of a category.
Identity
[edit]Let f : A → B be a morphism of a category containing two objects A and B. Associated with these objects are the identity morphisms 1A : A → A and 1B : B → B. By composing these with f, we construct two morphisms:
- f o 1A : A → B, and
- 1B o f : A → B.
Both are morphisms between the same objects as f. We have, accordingly, the following coherence statement:
- f o 1A = f = 1B o f.
Associativity of composition
[edit]Let f : A → B, g : B → C and h : C → D be morphisms of a category containing objects A, B, C and D. By repeated composition, we can construct a morphism from A to D in two ways:
- (h o g) o f : A → D, and
- h o (g o f) : A → D.
We have now the following coherence statement:
- (h o g) o f = h o (g o f).
In these two particular examples, the coherence statements are theorems for the case of an abstract category, since they follow directly from the axioms; in fact, they are axioms. For the case of a concrete mathematical structure, they can be viewed as conditions, namely as requirements for the mathematical structure under consideration to be a concrete category, requirements that such a structure may meet or fail to meet.
References
[edit]- Mac Lane, Saunders (1971). "7. Monoids §2 Coherence". Categories for the working mathematician. Graduate texts in mathematics. Vol. 4. Springer. pp. 161–165. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-9839-7_8. ISBN 9781461298397.