for visual identification of the person in question, at the top of his/her biographical article
Not replaceable with free media because (WP:NFCC#1)
No alternate image could be found using Google's "reuse" selection on Google Images, nor where any photos found of Maria Radner of Flickr. If any free photograph of her is found, this photo will be deleted.
This photo will be used only on her article, as a primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the person in question.
Since she is deceased, using this file will not hurt the potential commercial interest in this photograph, or damage the photograph in any way, shape or form, by print or electronically.
The subject of the photograph has been deceased since: March 24, 2015
This is a copyrighted image that has been released by a company or organization to promote their work or product in the media, such as advertising material or a promotional photo in a press kit.
The copyright for it is most likely owned by the company who created the promotional item or the artist who produced the item in question; you must provide evidence of such ownership. Lack of such evidence is grounds for deletion.
It is believed that the use of some images of promotional material to illustrate:
the person(s), product, event, or subject in question;
where the image is unrepeatable, i.e. a free image could not be created to replace it;
Additionally, the copyright holder may have granted permission for use in works such as Wikipedia. However, if they have, this permission likely does not fall under a free license.
Warning sign
Please note that our policy usually considers fair use images of living people that merely show what they look like to be replaceable by free-licensed images and unsuitable for the project. If this is not the case for this image, a rationale must be provided proving that the image provides information beyond simple identification or showing that this image is difficult to replace by a free-licensed equivalent. Commercial third-party reusers of this image should consider whether their use is in violation of the subject's publicity rights.
