Jump to content

File talk:Hawk eating prey cropped.jpg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this photo

[edit]

Ummm... why is this photo being used in a template? sorry, I disagree with this. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 13:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant. It is a quality picture and fits the template. Opinion is not what Wikipedia is built upon, so the fact that you 'disagree with this' means absolutely nothing. ~九尾の氷狐~ (「Sumimasen!」 「Dochira samaka?」) 11:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What is "verifiability, not truth" other than a lot of people agreeing to something? Not that I'm bashing Wikipedi mind you. Steve isn't wrong to disagree, there are plenty of non-violent eating-related images that could be used, not that I personally have much problem with this image/cropping. --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 03:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Don't act ignorant. You know why some dislike such images. I disagree with such graphic images because it affects people with obsessive compulsive disorder. Now I hope this image won't pop into my mind during intercourse. It's a serious issue. HyborianRanger (talk) 02:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I find it hard to believe that use of such a graphic picture is pure chance, given all the other potential feeding images out there. Frankly. I was shocked when I saw this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.167.6.44 (talk) 22:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure we can find a feeding photo that is less graphic... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oarsof6 (talkcontribs) 21:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What. A. Vile. Picture. Seriously, something less graphic should be found. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.100.197.144 (talk) 06:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC) This is a nasty picture. Can we use something else? @_@ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.64.79 (talk) 15:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]