File talk:Notophthalmus viridescens edit.jpg
Appearance
Following authors comments at the lend of the image's FPC nomination page and further discussion at the FPC talk page, here are three versions for comparison:
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Notophthalmus_viridescensPCCA20040816-3983A.jpg/600px-Notophthalmus_viridescensPCCA20040816-3983A.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/69/Notophthalmus_viridescens_edit.jpg/600px-Notophthalmus_viridescens_edit.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e4/Notophthalmus_viridescensPCCA20040816-3983edit1.jpg/600px-Notophthalmus_viridescensPCCA20040816-3983edit1.jpg)
I'm not at all sure my edit (the third one) is any more accurate than the original.. the CC shift is about the same as you'd expect with a warm Wratten 81C filter removed, if that makes any sense. The tree and old needles look more natural to me, but the author's thoughts in particular would obviously be welcome. --mikaultalk 19:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)