File talk:Universe Reference Map (Location) 001.jpeg

hey, there's an error, the orbit of pluto intersects neptune's —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikef777 (talk • contribs) 07:53:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

That's not an error. Pluto's orbit does intersect Neptune's. -- kenb215 talk 02:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

I think that's what he meant. This image does not show Pluto's orbit intersecting Neptune's. They appear to come close but do not cross over 82.46.49.45 (talk) 16:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

ps on the 40LY scale, which yellow dot is the solar system, the big one or the small one. And what is the other one? 82.46.49.45 (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

File size

Why is the file size 5 MB if the image is 36MP? Gboycolor (talk) 02:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Image dimensions

This image appears to be upsampled to a larger size than the original. Given that the file is too large for most browsers to display easily, and that no additional detail is provided by upsampling, I suggest that this image be scaled back down to its original size. - David McCabe (talk) 07:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Milky Way is depicted incorrectly

The Milky Way is clearly depicted as a spiral galaxy when it is generally agreed it is a barred spiral galaxy. This makes this map badly out of date. Wlmg (talk) 00:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Fornax

"Fornax" is depicted in the Local Group as being less than 4 Mly away and in the Supercluster as being over 30 Mly away. The closer is apparently referring to the constellation and the farther one is properly the "Fornax Cluster". Rather than having this glaring contradiction calling them both "Fornax", one should definitely be re-labeled "Fornax Cluster". Calling the other "Fornex Constellation" might be nice but is not necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Megiddo1013 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)