File talk:Wiki-facial.png
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Wiki-facial.png. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this file. You may wish to ask factual questions about Wiki-facial.png at the Reference desk. |
Image comment[edit]
as with the other similar picture, I have to ask again, I don't see the point of putting this picture on said article, just seems gratuitous. Would anyone with an opposing view care to chime in? --70.26.68.102 (talk) 14:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
That's about as un-gratuitous as you can get while portraying the act realistically. 71.55.253.100 (talk) 04:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- yyep pretty much --96.243.180.70 (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Why the hell do you need two pictures?[edit]
Everyone wants to argue that NO THIS ISN'T GRATUITOUS yet you have two pictures demonstrating this act. Right. That's not gratuitous at all.
- srsly, how bout just one real picture —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.235.178.71 (talk) 01:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
how about two pictures, the cartoon "theory" and a photographed, real depiction similar to the pearl necklace? It would be no more gratuitous than it currently is. (86.150.112.166 (talk) 20:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC))
How about a short video clip? It would be much more educational. 99.32.57.120 (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
