Talk:486958 Arrokoth/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starsandwhales (talk · contribs) 17:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It should take a week or two for me to review this article. starsandwhales (talk) 17:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Some things are unclear to the average reader, such as the mentions of streaming instability. starsandwhales (talk) 16:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There have been edit conflicts in the past, have these been fully resolved? starsandwhales (talk) 16:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Starsandwhales: I've changed and reworded some technical sentences in the article, including the streaming instability part in the Formation section. About the edit conflict, it has been fully resolved. Nrco0e (talk) 17:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good.