Talk:1947–1948 civil war in Mandatory Palestine/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Review started |08:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)|Vinay84 (talk) 08:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis section is too Verbose.

Eg: the explosions of joy amongst the Jewish community were counterbalanced
by the expression of discontent amongst the Arab community

can be sinmplified to: say ; "Jews became happy and/though Arabs were left discontent".

Also, it can be merged with the background section

Reference in Footnote no 3 is an invalid link. IT supposedly refers to the UN resolution

Too many Duplicate statements. "...joy of the Jewish community were counterbalanced by ..." statement appears again in "Beginning of the Civil War" section in a modified form.

Vinay84 (talk) 09:59, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Review is now Finished, Important points of the conflict are well covered, but there are some strong statements which need sourcing.They possibly came about during Translation from French.

Sections/topics with separate articles like the various individual operations can have smaller Summaries.

I have put the nomination on Hold for a week till 1 October 2009 0500 GMT.

Summary[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Vinay84 (talk) 12:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Lot of time given for the article to be improved. Not much change seen. Failing the article Vinay84 (talk) 04:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]