Talk:2005 Football League Championship play-off final/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Going to review for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 08:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead[edit]

  • "took part in play-off semi-finals;" - shouldn't it be the play-off semi-finals;
    Not necessarily, it's not been in a problem in the other 20 or so GAs, and it reads fine to me. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 16:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Route to the final[edit]

Background[edit]

Summary[edit]

Post-match[edit]

Reference[edit]

Am putting the review hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 11:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, MWright96, all addressed and/or responded to. Thanks for your review. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 16:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]