Talk:2008 Georgia Imperial Sugar refinery explosion

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2008 Georgia Imperial Sugar refinery explosion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

2008 Georgia Imperial Sugar refinery explosion has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 28, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 23, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 2008 Georgia sugar refinery explosion resulted in thirteen deaths and the first major shutdown of a US sugar refinery since Hurricane Katrina?

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Georgia (U.S. state) Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2008 Georgia sugar refinery explosion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Either expand the paragraphs in the lead or merge them so there are two paragraphs, because they are very short right now.

Done Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 10:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The sugar refinery in question was" → "The sugar refinery was"

Done Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 10:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"it was the town of 3,500's main employer prior to the disaster." – really needs to be reworded, as it isn't immediately obvious that "town of 3,500" is a phrase on its own

Done Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 10:42, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you use measurements, like in "160 acre site and was spread across 872,000 square feet", use the {{convert}} template so that alt. measurements are shown.

Done Except for hundredweight, two reasons: 1) I don't know if the source meant short or long cwt, and 2) in any event, the template doesn't seem to support it properly, as Template:Convert/list of units/mass lists them, but doesn't suggest anything that it can be converted to. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 11:13, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Explosion and emergency response" is made up of far too many small paragraphs; I recommend improving the flow and expanding or merging paragraphs appropriately.

Done I think, I have tried to restructure but let me know if more is needed. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 10:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gary King (talk) 06:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are some short paragraphs in " Aftermath". Perhaps they can be merged? For instance, "Port Wentworth saw an" and "In the first quarter of 2008" both discuss economics issues; they could be merged, perhaps. Gary King (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I have restructured the section. I tried to group like topics together - demolition/reconstruction, economics and legal work. The exception was the emergency shutdown and fine; I stuck that with the first lot. Look OK? Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article reaches GA criteria and has therefore been passed. Gary King (talk) 21:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated

Added the outdated tag just because of the last paragraph of the intro section and the 'Aftermath' section of the article. Squalk25 (talk) 17:41, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Still outdated. For the last section, "The plan is for the plant to return to sugar refining by the end of 2008.[2][13] Demolition of the sugar silos was conducted on June 24, 2008 with a wrecking ball. Demolition is set to continue from that date for a week of the area at the center of the explosion. A replacement packaging building and new sugar silos are intended to be completed by Summer 2009." It's three years later, yet there is no information on status of rebuilding, if the plant ever was rebuilt, if so, is it operational.Wzrd1 (talk) 02:40, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who died?

Names of the dead. 172.222.189.111 (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]