Talk:2009 Fiordland earthquake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Blimey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Satirical Platypus (talkcontribs) 02:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Australia affected?[edit]

There were tsunami warnings and evacuations for Australia, but as there were no tsunami and the earthquake did not 'quake' Australia, should it really be listed as one of the countries affected? Adabow (talk) 10:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aftershocks[edit]

I don't think we need a section on aftershocks. This data could be summarised, either verbally or as a graph and/or map. See 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake's section for an example. Adabow (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology[edit]

This was not the "largest New Zealand earthquake", etc, but the "strongest", surely! Also, it was not a "magnitude 7.8 earthquake" but an earthquake of magnitude 7.8 on the Moment magnitude scale. There are other scales.203.184.41.226 (talk) 07:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]