Talk:The 2nd of May
(Redirected from Talk:2nd of May)
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 15 April 2015[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move to The 2nd of May; "2nd of May" will remain a redirect to the album. Cúchullain t/c 12:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
2nd of May → 2nd of May (album) – As similar articles and RMs, redirect to May 2. (..cannot see how this passes WP:NALBUMS?) In ictu oculi (talk) 21:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Strong support per nom WP:ASTONISH -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 08:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - the actual title is The 2nd of May. Unreal7 (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Move to The 2nd of May as per Unreal7. Dohn joe (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Also support move to The 2nd of May. Very unlikely the reader would type the lengthy The 2nd of May expecting the date, and if they did, there's a hatnote to point them in the right direction. Zarcadia (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. If someone wants an article about the date, they won't type in extra words. Man from Nephew (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Clearly not the primary topic for 22nd of May. That would be a date. Note that it's not just about what readers might type in; it's also about what might be linked. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.