Jump to content

Talk:ATLAH World Missionary Church

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atlah Worldwide Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 May 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)Guanaco 06:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Atlah Worldwide ChurchATLAH World Missionary Church – Official name of the church according to their website.. 209.183.164.82 (talk) 20:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ATLAH World Missionary Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

[edit]

I flagged this article for neutrality/POV issues. The intro paragraph alone is filled with obvious editorializing. I understand this church is a highly controversial organization so it may be difficult to reach consensus on what language to use, but I hope all will agree the flag is necessary for now. Westknife (talk) 19:51, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, apparently I was looking at a vandalized version of the article, and it has now been corrected. Westknife (talk) 12:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI neutrality

[edit]

With recent edits by an editor associated with the subject, need folks here to review the article again for COI. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the recently added content as COI/Self Promotion as the sole purpose seems to be to introduce their specific activities into the article. Beyond that, looks like several experienced editors have edited the page and performed cleanups, so not sure there's any active COI concerns in the article. Though feel free to reintroduce the tag if you still have concerns as it was wiped in the reversion. Slywriter (talk) 19:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]