Jump to content

Talk:Abdul Hakkim Azhari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Abdul Hakeem Azhari)

Requested move 1 September 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) Havelock Jones (talk) 16:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Abdul Hakeem AzhariAbdul Hakkim Azhari – Abdul Hakkim Azhari is the official name of person. therefor need rename of article name to that. Irfan Arimbra (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting.  ASUKITE 02:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed! 2409:4073:4D9A:56FD:0:0:4FC9:3B07 (talk) 05:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Islam has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 02:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 9 January 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Seeing no opposition (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 15:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Abdul Hakeem AzhariAbdul Hakkim Azhari – Looks that this is the most common name. It gets 25,300 hits on Google and the current title "Abdul Hakeem Azhari" has just 3560 hits. Several months ago I opposed the RM because I applied the common name rationale differently. Calling for a procedural discussion although I feel this to be an uncontroversial move. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.