Talk:Air Force Doctrine Development and Education Center

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Air Force Doctrine Development and Education Center redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by Caerbannograbbit (talk · contribs) on 17 August 2012 with the comment:
The AFDDEC became the LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education 3 years ago and the LeMay Center has its own wikipedia site. Delete the AFDDEC site to remove duplicate information and to reduce content management
It was contested by RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs) on 17:33, 18 August 2012‎ with the comment:
DePRODed; It is my opinion that the content be merged with LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education and a redirect be left in this article space

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

speedy deletion copyvio issues[edit]

Isn't the fact that this is sourced (see the end of the article, under "External Links") and the source is a public domain site help any? I am in the process of paraphrasing this article (I seem to be better at finding information than writing about it....), but I have not "directly copied" this article from the USAF factsheet site. NDCompuGeek 04:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't realize it was a public domain site -- "Privacy and security" isn't where I usually look for such statements on a website. For the record, it states that it can be copied at [[1]]. Hopefully this will end such debates.