Talk:Alcoholic beverages in Oregon/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I have added a fact tag in one spot where I would like to see a reference.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
There is one place that I would like to see a reference, so I am placing the article on hold. Other than that, it looks very nice! Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 17:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, and one other thing - is there anything to the last post on the talk page about Absinthe in Oregon? I didn't see anything in the article itself about it... Dana boomer (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added a ref for the fact tag.[1] Apparently we have Absinthe now.[2] Did you want me to add info on it? - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the ref. I would say that a brief mention of Absinthe in the Spirits production section would probably be appropriate. Something along the lines of how an Oregon-based manufacturer was the second in the nation to produce and manufacture absinthe after new chemical studies showed that the amount of a prohibited botanical was under legal limits. Except more encyclopedic :) Dana boomer (talk) 20:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! I added a couple sentences about absinthe, glad you caught that. -Pete (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Very nice work, and thanks for the quick response. Dana boomer (talk) 21:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 22:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]