Talk:Al-Nasir Ahmad, Sultan of Egypt/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:An-Nasir Ahmad, Sultan of Egypt/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zanhe (talk · contribs) 18:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- The prose is clear and concise, and well written. I've fixed a few very minor grammatical issues. Earwig reports no copyright violations. However, there are contradictory statements in the "Reign" section: "a delegation of Egypt-based emirs ... arrived in al-Karak to inform an-Nasir Ahmad of Qawsun's execution", but later, Ahmad "ordered Qawsun and Altunbugha ... to be executed." -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- I've corrected the mistake per the source (see edit summary). The delegation informed the sultan of Qawsun's ouster. The sultan had him executed after his arrival to Egypt. --Al Ameer (talk) 03:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Lead, layout, formatting are in compliance. Not related to fiction or lists. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
Reliable sources cited throughout. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- C. No original research:
All conclusions or opinions are supported with reliable neutral sources. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
I can't think of any important aspect that the article does not cover. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
It is focused and does not contain excessive details. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
Neutrally written in a dispassionate tone. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
No edit wars. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status:
The sole image is tagged with a free license. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
There's only one image, and no portrait of the man, but that's expected for an article about a Muslim ruler. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
A well written article with some minor issues that need to be fixed. Almost there. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
@Zanhe: Thanks for the review and the improvements. I addressed your point above and corrected the contradictory statement about Qawsun. Let me know if there's any other issues. Cheers --Al Ameer (talk) 03:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Article now meets all GA criteria. Thanks for the interesting and well written article. -Zanhe (talk) 19:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)