Talk:Antihypertensive

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is a candidate to be the Medicine Collaboration of the Week.

Pharmacology Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 11 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Antihypertensive drug to Antihypertensive. The result of the discussion was moved.

Promotion of Adalat?

Why is Adalat the only brand name noted after the INN (generic) name, and the only medication to have an outside link at the bottom of the page? This should either be deleted or expanded to include other medications. My preference would be to delete the reference to the brand name on this page and leave that to the entries for the individual medications. Thoughts? -- 198.190.245.10 (talk) 22:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't the Renin Inhibitor category discussed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.154.211.118 (talk) 16:37, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia guidelines WP:MEDMOS encourage using generic name first with brand name in parenthesis on first reference. The reason is that many people are more familiar with the brand name, many doctors use brand names, many news media reports use brand names, and it makes it easier for the reader to understand the entry if we include the brand name that he or she is familiar with. Sometimes this is a safety issue, when a drug is dangerous and you want to make it clear what drug you're talking about. I don't want to promote brand names, but the main goal is making it as easy as possible for the reader to understand exactly what drug you're talking about. --Nbauman (talk) 03:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Antihypertensive article name??

I think this article should be name Antihypertensive drugs right??, please of you leave a comment notify me at my talk page MaenK.A._Talk 18:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what is the indication of antihypertensive drug????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.82.222.177 (talk) 04:15, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how the refs supports

Despite thiazides being cheap, effective, and recommended as the best first-line drug for hypertension by many experts, they are not prescribed as often as some newer drugs. This is because they have been associated with increased risk of new-onset diabetes and as such are recommended for use in patients over 65 where the risk of new-onset diabetes is outweighed by the benefits of controlling systolic blood pressure.^[1]

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Zillich AJ; Garg J; Basu S; et al. (August 2006). "Thiazide diretics, potassium and the development of diabetes: a quantative review". Hypertension. 48 (2): 219–224. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000231552.10054.aa. PMID 16801488. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |unused_data= ignored (help)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antihypertensive drug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090313072133/http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg034quickrefguide.pdf to http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg034quickrefguide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antihypertensive drug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216204848/http://www.nice.org.uk:80/download.aspx?o=CG034quickrefguide to http://www.nice.org.uk/download.aspx?o=CG034quickrefguide

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Antihypertensive drug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110304150457/http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon731.pdf to http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon731.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100826074015/http://www.australianprescriber.com/magazine/33/4/108/12 to http://www.australianprescriber.com/magazine/33/4/108/12
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nice.org.uk/download.aspx?o=CG034quickrefguide

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

choice of thiazide

Because of ALLHAT and the VA-NHLBI study and others, the evidence for a mortality benefit of chlorthalidone is stronger than for other thiazide, such as hydrochlorothiazide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbelknap (talk • contribs) 17:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No Nitrates?

Is there a reason that I'm missing why nitrates such as GTN wouldn't be included here?

117.20.68.51 (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Steven[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: PHMD 2040 Service - Learning Fall 2023

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 May 2023 and 29 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Benadryl Submarine, Slph01 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Benadryl Submarine (talk) 10:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History section

I am doing research to expand the History section of this article. Slph01 (talk) 21:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Waqar💬 16:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Antihypertensive drug → Antihypertensive – Make shorter (WP:CONCISE, WP:PRECISE), in line with other drug classes like diuretics, analgesics, and antibiotics. –Tobias (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Waqar💬 15:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Follow-up comment: I didn't say anything while the RM was open since I didn't feel very strongly about it, but I think it's worth acknowledging that the other examples listed ("diuretics", "analgesics" and "antibiotics") are all clearly nouns, while "antihypertensive" is naturally an adjective rather than a noun, and Wikipedia prefers WP:NOUNs. I suppose the word "antihypertensive" is often used as a noun, but that seems a bit informal / grammatically improper. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, it's a noun like the other ones you listed. Furthermore, each of them can be used as an adjective, all in a medical rather than an informal context, according to the Cambridge Dictionary, so they're not necessarily "clearly nouns". Everything else may depend on the region you're in or the way people around you speak. –Tobias (talk) 19:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They were presented as plurals in the nomination statement, which makes them clearly nouns. Adjectives are not pluralized like that. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I referred to them as nouns, just like "antihypertensives". There was no adjective in the nomination whatsoever, but each of them can be used as an adjective in its singular form: "diuretic", "analgesic", and "antibiotic". Otherwise, I think I don't quite get your point. As I mentioned before, each of them can be used as both an adjective and a noun. –Tobias (talk) 20:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[ahg2008-1] Zillich AJ; Garg J; Basu S; et al. (August 2006). "Thiazide diretics, potassium and the development of diabetes: a quantative review". Hypertension. 48 (2): 219–224. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000231552.10054.aa. PMID 16801488. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |unused_data= ignored (help)

[1]