Talk:Avenue (group)

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: The X Factor Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the X Factor task force.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

could anyone help me find more information on this group? This entry is messy due to lack of information. I think they are a worthy entry to wikipedia, but more needs to be found out about them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrsTomFletcher (talk • contribs) 16:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"More needs to be found out"? This passive construction seems to mean "please someone else do my work for me." It is best to research first and then write. Admins, I'm afraid this cannot be speedied anymore; unfortunately they exist and have coverage, at least for this one event. Apparently they still exist. Drmies (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

as much as i'd love to edit this page, i just don't have the time on my hands and i'm not asking someone else to do everything, just to help me out. And they very much exist. MrsTomFletcher (talk) 16:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC) talk[reply]

Well, you had time enough to start it. But Wikipedia doesn't work that way--research first, then write. And of course they exist, but just because they exist doesn't mean they have to have an article. Drmies (talk) 03:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's because i felt it needed to be started, and i'm still quite new to wikipedia. MrsTomFletcher (talk) 18:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Avenue (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081207165154/http://www.polyhex.com/music/chartruns/chartruns.php to http://www.polyhex.com/music/chartruns/chartruns.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]