Talk:Battle of Málaga (1704)
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Battle of Vélez-Málaga)
![]() | Battle of Málaga (1704) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 7, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 24, 2024. |
Byng's actions and the outcome of the battle
[edit]I think the statement at the end of the second paragraph, stating that Byng was censured for his actions, is misleading at best. Byng went on to fight in fleet actions in 1707 and 1708 and won a major battle in 1718 (not to mentioned being created a peer in 1721) -- as noted in his Wiki page. It would seem that this section needs to be worked on. (WHRupp (talk) 12:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC))
- Good point. Wholly improbable, Byng was knighted on 22 October by Queen Anne ‘as a testimony of her high approbation of his behaviour in the late action’, was promoted to vice-admiral just over a two months later, and was commanding a squadron in the Channel by summer 1705. Other inconsistencies in this article include stating that Byng's ship, Royal Katharine, was badly damaged. Byng was actually aboard Ranelagh. Benea (talk) 16:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Málaga (1704)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Spudlace (talk · contribs) 19:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
I am reviewing this article. Spudlace (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- You can take over the review if you want. Don't see that it needs two reviewers. Spudlace (talk) 15:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- This article has two reviewers? I didn't even think it had one! Dabberoni15 (talk) 23:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Dabberoni15: Oh, you can't review articles you've nominated, but don't worry, I'm going to pass this. It's well-written, has a good lede, no copyright violations. Sources are reliable and cited using a consistent citation style. No issues with neutrality or original research. Article is stable. Images are in the public domain and explained with appropriate captions. Good work! Spudlace (talk) 18:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- This article has two reviewers? I didn't even think it had one! Dabberoni15 (talk) 23:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class Dutch military history articles
- Dutch military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- GA-Class Spanish military history articles
- Spanish military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- GA-Class GibraltarpediA-related articles
- Mid-importance GibraltarpediA-related articles
- GibraltarpediA-related articles
- Selected anniversaries (August 2024)