Jump to content

Talk:Brønnøysund Airport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBrønnøysund Airport has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 10, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Brønnøysund Airport, Brønnøy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Compdude123 (talk · contribs) 22:53, 23 November 2012 (UTC) Hello, this is my first GA review so bear with me. I know you've done lots of GA reviews, so if I'm missing anything, please let me know. —Compdude123 22:53, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overall review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Most of the sources are in Norwegian, and since I don't speak that language, I cannot verify any of the sources. Hopefully you have done this.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]
  • The first issue I noticed is that the lead and infobox both state two different runway lengths for the same runway. The infobox says the runway is 1,200 m long whereas the lead says it's 1,440 meters long. Please correct whichever one is wrong.
  • "It has of a 1,440-meter (4,720 ft) runway numbered 04–22..." – Remove the "of".
  • "Near-by" isn't normally hyphenated; it's usually written as "nearby."

History

[edit]
  • The following two sentences could be combined: "The following thirteen years Brønnøysund only saw occasional landings. Norwegian Air Lines started a service from Bergen to Tromsø on 7 June 1935, which included a stop at the harbor in Brønnøysund." Would suggest saying something like "Brønnøysund only saw occasional landings until 7 June 1935, when Norwegian Air Lines started a service from Bergen to Tromsø with a stop at the harbor in Brønnøysund."
  • "The aircraft turned out to have too little capacity" – Consider saying something more concise, like "The aircraft turned out to be too small...".
    • My thought here is that the aircraft were replaced because they had too few seats (=capacity), but if other people don't understand it the way I do I can always convert to small. For a aviation-oriented audience I would have written "too low pax". Arsenikk (talk) 00:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It now says "The aircraft turned out to have too small..." – The "have" should be changed to "be" in order to correct this grammatical error. Or you could say "The aircraft's passenger capacity was too small..." —Compdude123 18:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, could you fix this please? Thanks, Compdude123 16:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More reviewing to come... —Compdude123 22:53, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for commencing the review. Arsenikk (talk) 00:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So far, so good. Looks like there's just some minor changes you need to make. Also, I take it you have checked all the references to make sure they provide proper verification for the text in question, right? I can't really do this myself since most of this article's sources are in Norwegian, a language I don't know. —Compdude123 18:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All information is properly cited in the inline references. Arsenikk (talk) 10:54, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Facilities

[edit]

Looks fine; don't see anything wrong with the section. —Compdude123 18:50, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Airlines and destinations

[edit]

Nothing to comment. —Compdude123 18:50, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents and accidents

[edit]

Future

[edit]

I have put this article on hold. There is just one more thing in the history section I need you to fix. —Compdude123 16:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The one outstanding issue has been fixed. Arsenikk (talk) 20:54, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay great, this is now a good article. Congratulations! —Compdude123 06:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Brønnøysund Airport, Brønnøy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brønnøysund Airport, Brønnøy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]