Talk:The Homosexuals (CBS Reports)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Will review shortly. Cheers, Ricardiana (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion 1: well-written[edit]

This is a well-written article, and received a helpful peer review. I would like to note, however, that a sentence criticized as ungrammatical during the peer review ("The Homosexuals garnered mixed critical response, with the network garnering praise from some quarters and criticism from others for even airing the program.") was in fact perfectly grammatical. I don't know that it's worth changing back, however. In any case, looks good here.

Criterion 2: factually accurate and verifiable[edit]

Good here.

Criterion 3: broad in its coverage[edit]

It looks like you've covered all major aspects of the topics and most of the secondary sources that discuss the documentary.

Criterion 4: neutral[edit]

Good here.

Criterion 5: stable[edit]

Very stable.

Criterion 6: illustrated, if possible, by images[edit]

I think that this needs to be beefed up a bit. I'll about doing it myself. Ricardiana (talk) 22:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changed. Ricardiana (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict[edit]

It's a Good Article! Congratulations! Ricardiana (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]