Talk:Order of precedence in India

India: Politics High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article was last assessed in September 2008.

List or table?

Currently, the order of precedence is presented in the form of a table, with the numbers added in manually. Wouldn't it make more sense to do this as an ordered list, where the numbering is done automatically?

For example, the first two lines would look like this:

instead of this:

Rank	Member
1	President
2	Vice President
3	...

Any thoughts? Alkari 22:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a table is better. I'll clean it up. =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect example

This order / warrant of precedence is incorrect. Many persons are placed on certain numbers. For example, there may be ten categories of ranks / posts / authorities in a single article. Lawexpert 16:22, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For example? =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deputy chairman of rajya sabha is replaced byHarivansh Narayan Singh. Please update. Bhrt06 (talk) 17:54, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

http://rajyasabha.nic.in/guidelinesmlamp/chap11.htm

What Happened to the article

This article is coming up as empty, with only the heading repeated. Why? 106.216.128.234 (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian order of precedence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140704022423/http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/guidline_govt_mp/chap11.pdf to http://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/guidline_govt_mp/chap11.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 30 August 2018

This edit request to Indian order of precedence has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change Name of UPSC Chairman Vinay Mittal to Arvind Saxena. Vishnuprasadp (talk) 08:35, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sam Sailor 22:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Various incorrect names / old names

Example: Lok Sabha Speaker is now On Birla Jsmatharu (talk) 18:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leader of Opposition is now Shri Mallikarjun Kharge, INC as Shri Ghulam Nabi Azad has retired and thereby relinquished his position as Member of Rajya Sabha since February 2021. Pranjal Dey21 (talk) 05:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2020

This edit request to Indian order of precedence has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

At number 23 "Officers of the rank of full general or equivalent rank in the Indian Armed Forces" Should not be here. As it's already at no. 12 in the order. 27.56.184.150 (talk) 08:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Both the article and its source say that only Chiefs of staff holding full general or equivalent rank are at number 12, all other full generals or equivalent are at number 23 Danski454 (talk) 08:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]