Jump to content

Talk:Chemakum people

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Chimakum)

Confusing and somewhat editorializing bit

[edit]

I just took out this bit, from the history section:

Chimakum (Chemakum) Indians were a war-like tribe, and eventually paid penance for their constant looting and interference in tribal business between the Barclay Sound tribe and their friends, the Snohomish tribe, when the tribes created a bi-partisan attack on the Chimakum, effectively decimating them with exception of a small number of people. <ref>{{Cite book|title=With Pride in Heritage: history of Jefferson County|last=Jefferson County Historical Society|first=|publisher=|year=1966|isbn=|location=|pages=}}</ref>

And restored a simpler sentence that used to be used here:

In 1847 a disastrous conflict with the Suquamish devastated the Chimakum, effectively wiping them out.<ref name="buerge">{{cite web|url=http://content.lib.washington.edu/aipnw/buerge2.html|title=Chief Seattle and Chief Joseph: From Indians to Icons|last=Buerge|first=David M.|publisher=University of Washington|accessdate=11 July 2010}}</ref>

The removed bit seemed excessively editorialized, what with terms and phrases like "war-like tribe", and "paid penance for their constant looting...", as if they deserved being exterminated, men, women, and children. It was also confusing. What is the "Barclay Sound tribe"? Barclay Sound is on Vancouver Island and was territory of the Nuu-chah-nulth. If this is what is meant and is actually true, it needs to be much clearer. And, is this trying to say the Nuu-chah-nulth were "friends" with the Snohomish? Again, if this is true it needs to be clearer. And then this bit seems to say that the "Barclay Sound Tribe" and the Snohomish attacked and basically exterminated the Chimakum. Everything I've read about this says it was the Suquamish and Klallam who exterminated the Chimakum.

So I replaced this with a previous sentence to that effect. Since the bit I took out cites a source I've made this talk page section. I admit I do not have access to the source citied, but as far as I can tell it is a dubious source: With Pride in Heritage: history of Jefferson County, self-published in 1966. It might be a fine book for certain things, but I'm skeptical on its value for proto-historical Native American stuff. I could be wrong though, thus my making this talk page section. Pfly (talk) 04:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chimakum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]