Jump to content

Talk:Chris Adams (general)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Chris Adams (General))

Notability

[edit]

I'm entirely unable to assess the notability, or lack of it, conferred by the listed military decorations. I'm just concerned that the article is a WP:COATRACK in order to publicize six self-published books. Accounting4Taste:talk 22:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some of the POV in the mean time. SGGH speak! 16:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

xcellent dude — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.12.189.4 (talk) 03:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Adams (general). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph

[edit]

@Mary A. Adams: I'm responding to your post at the Teahouse regarding the picture in this article. If you have a better and suitably-licensed photograph that you would like to replace it with, please respond below by editing this section. If you describe the origin of the photograph, or link to where it's been used online in an official government site, we can discuss it here, confirm that it is public domain, that it is "better" for the article, and proceed from there. Thanks! —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 23:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]