Jump to content

Talk:Division 1-A Rugby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Non-notable is a very subjective term. Notable to who? How does one become notable? What needs to happen to move from non-notable to notable? Just because the competition is new, doesn't mean that it's "non-notable".

Additionally, ESPN is covering both the semi-finals, and finals of the competition. ESPN lends credibility to the competition, and provides visibility to this competition.

Mattsalt77 (talk) 23:10, 8 May 2011 (UTC) Matthew.[reply]

Wikipedia's notability guideline for sports-related notability is found here: Wikipedia:Notability (sports). Brambleclawx 23:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Sorry for messing up the way that this is supposed to go, but after looking around here is what I would say. College Premier Division is the Top-Tier of Collegiate Rugby in the USA. "A national championship season at the top collegiate level is generally notable." By that definition, it would make sense that an article describing the details, history & make-up of that level would be notable. I.E. If UC-Berkley wins the CPD, then that season would be notable. Also, the league that they played in to win that title would also have to be notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattsalt77 (talkcontribs) 03:40, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

California

[edit]

When referring to the the rugby program (or any other sports program) at the University of California, Berkeley, the school is commonly referred to at Cal or California. This page had the school listed as "Cal Berkeley" which is not a correct reference to the university's athletic department: University of California, Berkeley Names. This page has been changed to correctly reference the California rugby program. --CASportsFan (talk) 10:15, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-name?

[edit]

This competition has not been called the "College Premier Division" for some time; it is now called Division 1-A. Time to re-name the article? If so, what should be the new name? Some suggestions to throw around might include: (1) Division 1A Rugby; (2) D1A Rugby; (3) D1A College Rugby. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the USA Rugby website,[1] they style it as Men's Division I-A. It's probably better to make clear what the sport is, so it looks like USA College Rugby Men's Division I-A is closest to how they style it. It's going to be helpful, IMHO, to have the country and the sport in the article title if possible. —C.Fred (talk) 03:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Division 1-A Rugby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Division 1-A Rugby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]