Jump to content

Talk:Tulosesus impatiens/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC) Nice! I couldn't find a ce spot at all! Here we go:[reply]

  • Optional, but I'm just going to be a creep about File:Coprinellus impatiens 7449.jpg, and in my whiny southern dialect ask "Do ya' got any images without the little nametag in it?" ;)
  • In Tax and phylo:
  • From what is the name impatiens derived?
  • Can we fill in a few gaps in the generic shuffle? Specifically, the "why?" between Agaricus->Coprinarius, Coprinus->Psathyrella and Psathyrella->the initial Coprinellus.
  • These are difficult gaps to fill. There is explanation in the 2001 paper by Redhead et al., but honestly, it's very convoluted reading and assumes detailed knowledge of the specific laws and Articles of botanical nomenclature (trans: I'm lazy and don't want to figure it out). I think what's currently there should suffice for a GA-level coverage of the taxonomy of this species. Sasata (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for picking up both my nominations so quickly! I will address these comments and any you have on the other article in a day or two. Sasata (talk) 06:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Coprinellus impatiens passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass