Talk:Cretan school
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | On 25 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cretan School to Cretan school. The result of the discussion was moved. |
I'm sorry I have removed the connections between articles of other languages by mistake, please help!Idaeananvil (talk) 10:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cretan School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120524124904/http://www.i-m-patron.gr/keimena/xionadites.html to http://www.i-m-patron.gr/keimena/xionadites.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070721114930/http://www.nationalgallery.gr/html/en/sylloges/metavyz_texni.htm to http://www.nationalgallery.gr/html/en/sylloges/metavyz_texni.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090314101352/http://onassisusa.org/occ.art.htm to http://onassisusa.org/occ.art.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 25 April 2024[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
– These schools of icon painting should not be dressed up as proper names, per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS, since they're not nearly consistently capitalized in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Usage stats
- In each case, capitalization in books is not much more than half. Dicklyon (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Survey
- Support: These are not the proper names of schools, they are styles of painting or refer to informal groups of painters. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 00:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support - MOS guidance, specifically, is to "...lower-case schools of thought and practice..." Primergrey (talk) 01:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Which has rightly always been ignored in many cases - see Impressionism. But is it worth fighting the monomaniacs, on parade here, to get the policy re-written? Johnbod (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. Mellk (talk) 02:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. Tony (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Likely to confuse readers in many contexts in actual use. Johnbod (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. I don't see how this would introduce confusion. These are not the names of actual specific institutions, and lowercasing them would help clarify that. — BarrelProof (talk) 15:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)