Jump to content

Talk:David Wolfe (raw food advocate)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It really should say "Raw food Advocadoate" :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:4402:171F:9500:E9E3:1776:67A7:640B (talk) 07:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biased

[edit]

Wow. What a biased article. You guys aren't hiding your Big Pharma agenda, are you? So eating "raw foods" and using "alternative medicine" is "pseudoscience?" LOL You do realize, right, that not too many generations ago, ALL medicine was what you would call "alternative?" It's also ESTABLISHED SCIENCE that cooking destroys much of the nutrients and enzymes in fruit and vegetables. I guess you'd consider that pseudoscience too, huh? 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:544F:E012:2320:EFE4 (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We follow reliable sources. If you have reliable sources contradicting those used by the article, bring them.
Hint: You don't need to mention any sources whose reasoning goes along the lines of "this person disagrees with me, therefore they must be in the pay of Big Pharma" because sources with such abysmal reasoning ability are obviously garbage. --Hob Gadling (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There was no valid source for him being an advocate for a flat earth movement and it it was on his page. That shows a serious bias if you ask me. I have edited it accordingly. --Zaurus (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have distilled down over 20 years of this man's work into a window of 2020 where (I do not know but you claim) he rightfully expressed his views of breathing fresh air and not injecting yourself with toxins. This is why freedom is so important because of course someone who is dedicated to a natural lifestyle will not support forcing toxins onto people. Rebreathing your CO2 is not healthy no matter how many false "studies" you want to try to create about it. For the fact alone you start the article with namecalling and labeling - that is BIASED further you have almost nothing notable about his great work introducing the western world to many superfoods. This awful unbalanced attacking has lost me as wikipedia supporter... clearly you don't need my support though you are getting $$$ from other interests 162.142.119.16 (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Education

[edit]

Given his reputation for inflating (inventing?) his educational bona fides, is it possible to find a better source for his claimed education? 2.101.30.65 (talk) 15:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]