Talk:DeepStateMap.Live
DeepStateMap.Live has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 23, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from DeepStateMap.Live appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:DeepStateMap.Live/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 14:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Happy to review the article. AM
- @Amitchell125: Thank you for taking up this review! I hope you find the topic interesting, and if there is anything that needs improvement or fixing, I'm more than happy to try to. Cheers! Johnson524 (Talk!) 02:51, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Review comments
[edit]Lead section / infobox
|
---|
More comments to follow. Amitchell125 (talk) 06:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC) |
1.1 Deep State UA
|
---|
|
1.2 DeepStateMap.Live
|
---|
|
1.3 Present day
|
---|
|
1.3.1 Fundraising
|
---|
|
2 Map characteristics
|
---|
|
3 Sourcing
|
---|
|
3.1 Factuality
|
---|
|
4 Media attention and use
|
---|
|
5 See also
|
---|
|
6 References
|
---|
I am using WP:ABOUTSELF as a guide to say the sources used in the Primary subsection are acceptable. The citations are imo allowable because the text cited by them is uncontraversial, is about the map, and can be taken to be authentic. However:
|
On hold
[edit]I'm putting the article on hold for a week until 22 24 August to allow time for the issues raised to be addressed. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 11:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Amitchell125: Alright, that should be everything 🙂 To make things easier to double-check (because of how long I took to do these corrections-I'm so sorry!), I have highlighted any questions/comments I have. If I did not make a highlighted response, it means that the correction is completed, and I should have fixed the issue. If I have marked something as "done" that you still don't think is, please notify we with what I could do differently and I'll see what I can do, no offense taken. Thank you again, and cheers! Johnson524 (Talk!) 19:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Johnson524, I should be able to respond to your questions tomorrow to help complete the review, many thanks for your work on the article. Amitchell125 (talk) 19:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- I've put small red crosses ( ) to show comments that are still to be sorted, and crossed out where issues have been addressed. Completed section are collapsed. I've also extended the date so we can sort out the remaining issues, which don't look too difficulut. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 07:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I've finished (almost) all the final clean-up! To find my responses, look for my signature without the date "Johnson524 (Talk!)" under the request. There are only two remaining questions I have in the 1.2 and 3.1 sections, but other than that, I think we're good. Cheers! Johnson524 (Talk!) 22:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- I've put small red crosses ( ) to show comments that are still to be sorted, and crossed out where issues have been addressed. Completed section are collapsed. I've also extended the date so we can sort out the remaining issues, which don't look too difficulut. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 07:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Johnson524, I should be able to respond to your questions tomorrow to help complete the review, many thanks for your work on the article. Amitchell125 (talk) 19:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Passing
[edit]Passing now, great work. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 05:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 21:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- ... that the interactive map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine DeepStateMap.Live received 120,000 visitors in 30 minutes during the Battle of Izium in the 2022 Kharkiv counteroffensive? Source: https://suspilne.media/297474-avtori-deep-state-pro-kartu-boiv-problemi-z-google-ta-robotu-z-vijskovimi/
- ALT1: ... that the interactive map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine DeepStateMap.Live originally used Google Maps as a background, but was blocked by Google after being considered a legal liability? Source: https://suspilne.media/297474-avtori-deep-state-pro-kartu-boiv-problemi-z-google-ta-robotu-z-vijskovimi/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mandera Prison
Improved to Good Article status by Johnson524 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/DeepStateMap.Live; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
"Also notably"
[edit]The quote above has recently been added by me and removed by @100.8.98.146: over the past few days in the "Media attention and use" section. After the second revert by 100.8.98.146, I elected to bring the issue to the talk page. It is my belief the phrase, when used in the sentence News articles about the map itself or interviews with its creators have also notably been conducted by the [list of organizations]
, is important, because many companies have used the map- but these are just the more notable ones listed. If you go into the history of the article: many more notable organizations were once listed, but to not provide WP:UNDUE weight to the section, it was agreed before the GA review to only include organizations with an article on English Wikipedia in the list.
100.8.98.146 has argued that this phrase was not supported by any reliable sources, but when I pointed out what is stated above, they told me to "stop acting like you own this article," and I'm in no mood to deal with that crap. @Amitchell125: do you have anything to weigh in? I don't feel very strongly one way or another, and if this is in violation of WP:NPOV or some similar policy, then please remove it. Imo I still don't believe this is true in this particular situation, but I'll accept whatever you say. Cheers! Johnson524 13:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- GA-Class Maps articles
- Low-importance Maps articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class intelligence articles
- Intelligence task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- GA-Class Ukraine articles
- Mid-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles
- GA-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- GA-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles