User talk:Spasemunki/Shugden controversy

Intro
History
- Sourced from news/scholarly sources- no 'view of x' statements, or 'according to y'
- 1970's statements by DL
  - initial response
- 1996 Re-emergence
  - Statements by Government in Exile
  - protest by NKT and others
- 2008 Re-emergence
  - Expulsions from monastery
  - Creation of new Shugden monasteries
Views on the Conflict
- Separate views by origin; no in-text rebuttals
- According to the Dalai Lama and the TGIE
  - Historical views
    - DL/TGIE claims regarding DS @ time of 5th DL, other historical teachers
  - Reasons for abandoning practice in 20th century
- According to NKT/Pro-shugden sources (how to identify non-NKT pro-Shugden sources?)
  - Historical views
    - Views on lineage of Shugden, historical origin
  - Rebuttals to DL/TGIE rationale for abandoning shugden practice
Outside Views
- Views by scholars not connected with DL or NKT- Paul Williams, Martin Mills, etc
- Views of non-Gelugpa Tibetan Buddhist groups/schools
Claims of violence/discrimination
- By the NKT/pro-Shugden groups
- By the DL/TGIE - death of Lobsang Gyatso

Speedy Delete

I contested the speedy here. The only rationale given was that it was a 'test page', which I understand to be an attempting at trying out a few edits better suited to the sandbox. This page was created so people could collaborate on major changes to the article structure that were proposed at Talk:Dorje Shugden Controversy. There hasn't been a lot of movement on it lately, (likely my fault for being occupied elsewhere), but there's no deadline and an RfC at Dorje Shugden that could effect this article's structure is still open. --Clay Collier (talk) 20:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1) This page hasn't been edited since May, so I doubt anyone is going to do so.

2) Proposals and the like should not be created in the main space (where they are indexed by search engines. But as you want to keep it, I will move this to Talk:Dorje Shugden/Proposal where you can use it for further reference and discussion. Passportguy (talk) 20:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]