Talk:Eric Newby/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Untitled
Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?
- What a wonderful phrase to search for! In this case, I think it is appropriate. I can't find any appropriate prize he could have won, but it is important to note that he is highly regarded. --Canthusus 07:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- "He was awarded a CBE in 1994 and was given a lifetime achievement award by the British Guild of Writers in 2001." [1] He sold quite a few books and his newspaper columns were read by many when they were published. I wish there were more like him Stephenjh
Does anyone know why my image wont post within the article? It seems to have uploaded ok. [2] Stephenjh
It would be good to have an image. I have also fleshed the original article on Eric Newby with some of the most important details about his life and works. Ivankinsman 10:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Love and War in the Apennines publish date
The date differs on the list than in the article for Love and War in the Apennines. 75.142.145.54 (talk) 23:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Yoenit (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)