Jump to content

Talk:Monster of the Deep: Final Fantasy XV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Monster of the Deep: Final Fantasy XV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 15:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'll be doing the review of the article. Since I haven't done one in a while it might take some time but I'm pretty sure it will pass. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgesurreal777: First things first. I find this article in good shape but there are few issues that need to be solved:

  • Per WP:Lead, an introduction to the reception section could be added to the second paragraph or simply a third paragraph.
  • Can "Premise and gameplay" be expanded? I haven't played the VR but it seems like quite small based on the description. Maybe adding a description would help. to add more coverage similar to what we did with G-Bike where we even could add gameplay image and illustrate it.
  • I already added Tabata's image.
  • The prerelease section seems a bit simple with quotes and the idea of "x said this, y said that". Try rearranging it a bit like the the postrelease in. Try finding a point in common like a subject or just positive and negative.

Other than that, I might give the article another look but I think it's in good shape. The references seem to be reliable.Tintor2 (talk) 15:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok @Tintor2:, I think I got all of your requested changes, let me know what you think now! :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Let me go back to basics since it's been long since I reviewed an article.
  • 1. Well written: Passes Every issue I had with the writing was solved. I managed to understand everything from this article.
  • 2. Verifiable with no original research: Every sentence uses citations with generalizations properly used.
  • 3. It has proper coverage of the game, including making, reception, and further depiction of gameplay.
  • 4. Neutral: I managed to see it well written with the reception addressing well the reviews.
  • 5. Stable: No edit wars.
  • 6. Illustrated: Both logo and gameplay images provided.

Good workTintor2 (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]